Patna High Court
Bablu Kumar @ Bablu Yadav @ Bablu Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
Holding
The provisional bail granted to the petitioner is confirmed.
Summary
The petitioner, Bablu Kumar, was accused in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from a victim's statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS. The victim initially acknowledged knowing the petitioner and being in regular contact for nine months, but later alleged that the petitioner asked her to board his car and he took her away. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the victim’s earlier admission should outweigh the later allegation. The court examined the victim’s statement and the surrounding circumstances. Considering the facts, the court confirmed the provisional bail that had been granted to the petitioner on 3 December 2025 by a coordinate bench of the same court.
Issues considered
- Whether the provisional bail granted to the petitioner should be confirmed in view of the victim's statement under Section 183 of the BNSS.
Legislation cited
- BNSS — s. 183
Subjects
- provisional bail
- Section 183
- victim statement
- criminal miscellaneous
- bail confirmation
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81226 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2025 Thana- MOTIHARI MUFASIL District- East
Champaran
======================================================
Bablu Kumar @ Bablu Yadav @ Bablu Kumar Yadav S/o- Subhash Yadav
R/v- Baswariya Ps- Muffasil Dist- East Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Lalan Manjhi S/o- Dhukha Manjhi R/v- Rulahi W.No-6, Ps- Muffasil
Motihari Dist- East Champaran
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Abhishek Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR
PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
4 20-02-2026 Heard.
2. The victim’s statement recorded under Section-183
of BNSS shows that the petitioner was known to her and was on
talking term with the victim for nine months. According to
submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, she admitted
the above-noted facts in her earlier part in the statement under
Section-183 of BNSS but in later part, she has stated that on
asking of the petitioner, she boarded on his car and he took her
away.
3. The statement of the victim shows that the
petitioner was known to her and she was in talking terms with
him.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81226 of 2025(4) dt.20-02-2026
2/2
4. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,
the provisional bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 03-
12-2025 by a coordinate bench of this court, is confirmed.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
A.K.V.//-
U T
Checking your session…