Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner, finding that the circumstances warranted release on bond.

Summary

Mukesh Kumar was arrested in connection with the recovery of 490 grams of charas, alleged to be an offence under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The petitioner had previously applied for bail, which was denied by the same court on 25.06.2025. He argued that he is innocent, has no prior criminal record, and that no witnesses have been examined despite charges being framed. The State opposed the bail on the ground of the seriousness of the NDPS offence. Considering the intermediate quantity of the drug, the petitioner's clean antecedent and the length of his custody, the court allowed the bail application. The court ordered the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the same amount, subject to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in an NDPS case involving an intermediate quantity of charas, given the clean antecedent and custodial period.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • NDPS Act
  • bail
  • charas possession
  • intermediate quantity
  • clean antecedent
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81274 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2025 Thana- JITNA District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Mukesh Kumar Son of Late Teja Rai Resident of Village - Bakarihari, Ward
                 no.-2, P.S. - Dhaka, District - East Champaran.
                                                                          ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Abhishek Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Manoj Kumar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   05-05-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   Jitna P.S. Case No. 59 of 2025, registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 8/20(b)(ii)(B) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

                                3. This is the second attempt of the bail of the

                   petitioner. Earlier, the prayer for bail of the petitioner was

                   rejected by this Court vide order dated 25.06.2025 passed in Cr.

                   Misc. No. 38436/2025.

                                4. The recovery is of 490 grams of charas from the

                   possession of the petitioner.

                                5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. The

                   petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since

                   01.04.2025. But the cognizance has been taken on 21.06.2025.

                   In the trial, charges has been framed but no witnesses has been

                   examined.
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81274 of 2025(3) dt.05-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                                   6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer

                      for bail.

                                   7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

                      case, intermediate quantity of recovered charas, clean

                      antecedent of the petitioner and also period of custody, this bail

                      application is allowed.

                                   8. Let the petitioner above named, be granted bail on

                      furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand

                      Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                      satisfaction of learned Court concerned where the case is

                      pending/successor court in connection with Jitna P.S. Case No.

                      59 of 2025.

                                   9. It is made clear that any observation made herein is

                      prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

                      adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations

                      shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case

                      and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

                      manner.


                                                         (Sandeep Kumar, J)

Ranjeet/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.