Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Viphan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The court refused to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Viphan Rai, applied for regular bail in a case registered as Maner P.S. Case No. 74 of 2024, originally involving offences under Sections 363 and 365 of the IPC, with later additions of Sections 302, 364 and 201. The prosecution alleged that the deceased left with the petitioner, who later returned and the dead body was discovered; the petitioner was also found using the deceased’s mobile phone. He has been in custody since 19‑10‑2024. The court noted the seriousness and gravity of the allegations and the material evidence linking the petitioner to the crime. Considering these factors, the court was not inclined to grant regular bail. Consequently, the bail application was rejected.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner given the seriousness of the offences and the evidential material linking him to the crime.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • bail application
  • Indian Penal Code
  • Section 363
  • Section 365
  • Section 302
  • Section 364
  • Section 201
  • murder
  • theft
  • kidnapping
  • evidence tampering
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81607 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-74 Year-2024 Thana- MANER District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Viphan Rai S/o Sitaram Rai @ Sitaram Ray R/o Village - Goraiya Asthan,
                 Langa Tola, (Naga Tola), P.S - Maner, District - Patna

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Amarendra Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Raj Kishor Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   26-03-2026                  Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   Maner P.S. Case No. 74 of 2024 registered for the offence under

                   Sections 363 and 365 of the IPC and later on Sections 302, 364,

                   201 of the IPC was added.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, the deceased had left

                   with the petitioner, but subsequently the petitioner returned, and

                   the dead body of the deceased was found. The petitioner was

                   found using the mobile phone belonging to the deceased, which

                   was identified by the informant. The petitioner is in custody

                   since 19.10.2024.

                                4. The allegations against the petitioner are serious

                   and grave in nature. Sufficient materials have come during the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81607 of 2025(5) dt.26-03-2026
                                                        2/2




                      investigation to connect the petitioner with the crime.

                                    5. Considering the allegation levelled against the

                      petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the

                      petitioner.

                                    6. Accordingly, this application for regular bail stands

                      rejected.



                                                     (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.