Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Monu Kumar Singh @ Monu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner, ordering his release on a bond with sureties.

Summary

Monu Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a case involving 2.7 kg of charas and a loaded pistol, charged under IPC s.414, several provisions of the Arms Act and the NDPS Act. He has been in judicial custody since 21 March 2024, and no charge has yet been framed. The petitioner sought regular bail after an earlier application was rejected, invoking the principle that prolonged pre‑trial detention violates Article 21. The court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in Rabi Prakash v. State of Odisha, which held that such incarceration outweighs the statutory restriction under NDPS §37(1)(b). After hearing both sides, the court granted bail, directing release on a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite the seriousness of the offences and the NDPS statutory restriction.
  • Whether prolonged pre‑trial detention infringes the fundamental right to liberty under Article 21, thereby overriding NDPS §37(1)(b).
  • Whether bail can be granted when the trial has not commenced and charges are not yet framed.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • pre‑trial detention
  • Article 21
  • NDPS Act
  • Arms Act
  • IPC
  • fundamental rights
  • prolonged incarceration

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81989 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2024 Thana- MAJORGANJ District- Sitamarhi
                 ======================================================
                 Monu Kumar Singh @ Monu Singh S/o Shankar Singh Resident of Village-
                 Basant Khurd, P.S.- Suppi, District- Sitamarhi

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   16-01-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under section 414 of IPC,

                   Section 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and Sections

                   8/20(b)(ii)/21(b) of NDPS Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution is that altogether 2 kg

                   and 700 grams of charas like intoxicating substance along with

                   one loaded country made pistol was recovered from the

                   possession of this petitioner.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

                   that earlier his prayer for regular bail was rejected by this Court

                   vide order dated 19.03.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 16141 of

                   2025 with a liberty that the petitioner may renew his prayer for
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81989 of 2025(3) dt.16-01-2026
                                            2/3




          bail after six months if so advised.

                       5. The stage of trial has been called for from the

          learned trial court and from perusal of the report of the learned

          trial court, it is clear that till today, charge has not been framed

          and the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since

          21.03.2024.

                       6. In the case of Rabi Prakash vs. the State of

          Odisha, Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that the prolonged

          incarceration generally militate against the most precious

          fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the

          constitution of India and in such situation, the conditional

          liberty must override the statutory embargo created under

          Section 37 sub-clause 1(b) of the NDPS Act.

                       7. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State

          has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail to the petitioner.

                       8. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

          considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact

          that the trial has still not begun, I am incline to enlarge the

          petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be

          released on bail in connection with Majorganj P.S. Case No. 94

          of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand)

          with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81989 of 2025(3) dt.16-01-2026
                                                        3/3




                      learned Sessions Judge, Sitamarhi.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Shubham/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.