Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Tanveer ShekhversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail, finding no prima‑facie evidence against the petitioner beyond a self‑confession and noting that the charge‑sheet had already been filed.

Summary

The petitioner, Tanveer Shekh, was arrested in connection with a dacoity case (Jalley P.S. Case No. 200 of 2024) under Sections 310(2) and 311 of the B.N.S., though his name does not appear in the FIR. He was taken into custody on 23‑01‑2025 based solely on a self‑confessional statement, with no incriminating material recovered from him. The petitioner argued that there was no prima‑facie evidence linking him to the offence, that he had not been placed on a T.I.P., and that the charge‑sheet had already been filed, eliminating any risk of evidence tampering. The State opposed bail. The court held that, apart from the self‑confession, no material connected the petitioner to the crime and, given the completed charge‑sheet, bail was appropriate. Accordingly, the court ordered his release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 480(3) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • What is the adequacy of evidence, particularly a self‑confessional statement, to justify continued detention?
  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under Sections 310(2), 311 of the B.N.S. and Section 480(3) of the BNSS in the absence of prima‑facie material?
  • Whether the filing of a charge‑sheet eliminates the risk of tampering with evidence, warranting bail?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • dacoity
  • self‑confession
  • charge‑sheet
  • prima facie evidence
  • Section 480(3)
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82078 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2024 Thana- JALE District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 Tanveer Shekh Son of Sabir Shekh Resident of Village- Betaha, P.S.- Parihar
                 (Bela), District- Sitmarhi

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Nilendu Kumar Choudhary
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   09-02-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                2.      The         petitioner            seeks         bail        in

                   connection with Jalley P.S. Case No. 200 of 2024

                   registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 310(2) and 311 of B.N.S.

                                3. The petitioner is not named in the

                   F.I.R. and is in custody since 23.01.2025.

                                4. The allegation against the petitioner

                   is of committing dacoity and while committing

                   so, looted cash of Rs.45,000/- and golden

                   jewelry form the house of informant along with

                   other accused persons.

                                5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82078 of 2025(2) dt.09-02-2026
                                            2/3




          of the petitioner submitted that the name of

          petitioner transpired during investigation on the

          basis        of     self      confessional              statement,     in

          furtherance of which, no incriminating material

          appears              recovered/surfaced                    from      the

          possession of the petitioner as to connect them

          prima-facie with present occurrence of dacoity.

          It is further submitted that petitioner was not

          put on T.I.P. as yet. While concluding the

          argument, it is submitted that petitioner is

          found involved in six more criminal cases where

          he is on bail and moreover investigation of this

          case is completed, for which charge-sheet has

          been submitted, as such, there is no chance of

          tampering with the evidence.

                       6. Learned APP, opposed the prayer of

          bail.

                       7.      In      view        of          aforesaid    factual

          submissions and by taking note of fact as save

          and except self confession, nothing appears

          available against petitioner                           as to     connect
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82078 of 2025(2) dt.09-02-2026
                                                          3/3




                        prima-facie with present crime in question,

                        coupled with fact that charge-sheet has already

                        been submitted where petitioner is in custody

                        since 23.01.2025, accordingly petitioner above

                        named, is directed to be released on bail in

                        connection with Jalley P.S. Case No. 200 of 2024

                        on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees

                        Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

                        amount each to the satisfaction of learned

                        Additional              Chief            Judicial    Magistrate-I,

                        Darbhanga /concerned court, subject to the

                        conditions as mentioned under Section 480(3)

                        of BNSS.



                                                                 (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
Sudha/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.