Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ajit Kumar @ Prince @ Aditya Kumar @ Prince KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Since the allegations against the petitioner are prima facie based on hearsay and the investigation is complete, there is no risk of tampering, warranting bail under Section 437(3) Cr.P.C. and Section 480(3) BNSS.

Summary

Ajit Kumar was arrested in connection with a murder allegedly committed with a firearm, charged under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the BNS Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for bail, contending that the informant was not an eye‑witness and that the allegations were based on vague, omnibus hearsay. The State could not refute these factual submissions. The court observed that the investigation was already completed, a charge‑sheet had been filed, and there was no likelihood of evidence tampering. Considering the petitioner’s clean antecedents and the fact that a co‑accused had already been granted bail, the court ordered his release on bail subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C. and Section 480(3) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the seriousness of the offence and the completed investigation
  • Whether the allegations based on hearsay and lack of eyewitness testimony justify denial of bail
  • Whether the grant of bail to a co‑accused influences the bail decision for the petitioner

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • hearsay
  • arms act
  • murder
  • criminal procedure
  • investigation completed
  • surety
  • Section 437
  • Section 480
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82155 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-386 Year-2024 Thana- BAUNSI District- Banka
                 ======================================================
                 Ajit Kumar @ Prince @ Aditya Kumar @ Prince Kumar S/o Raj Kumar Sah
                 Resident Of Village- Siray, Ps- Bounsi, Dist- Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar.                                  ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Ravi Prakash Dwivedi, Advocate
                                                  Mr. Saurabh Raj, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Upendra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   10-02-2026                   Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Bounsi P.S. Case No. 386 of 2024 registered for the offence

                   under Sections 103(1), 61(2) of BNS and Section 27 of Arms

                   Act.

                                 3. The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and

                   is in custody since 28.12.2024.

                                 4. As per FIR, co-accused persons including

                   petitioner committed murder of son of the informant by

                   causing firearm injury.

                                 5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner submitted that admittedly the informant is not the

                   eye-witness of the occurrence and with very general and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82155 of 2025(3) dt.10-02-2026
                                            2/3




          omnibus allegation, she implicated petitioner with present

          crime in question without having any cogent materials. It is

          further submitted that similarly situated co-accused persons,

          namely, Gautam Kumar Yadav @ Gautam Kumar has already

          been granted bail by one of the learned co-ordinate Bench of

          this Court through Cr. Misc. No. 28763 of 2025 dated

          06.08.2025.           While concluding argument, it is submitted

          that investigation of this case is already completed, for which

          charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance

          of tampering with the evidence. Petitioner claimed clean

          antecedent.

                       6. Learned APP while opposing the prayer of bail

          could not disputed the aforesaid factual submission.

                       7. Considering the aforesaid factual submissions

          and by taking note of fact as the allegation prima facie

          appears to raised on the basis of suspicion arising out of

          hearsay input that too in very general and omnibus manner

          against the petitioner, who is in custody since 28.12.2024,

          coupled with the fact that investigation of this case is already

          completed, accordingly, petitioner above named, is directed to
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82155 of 2025(3) dt.10-02-2026
                                                          3/3




                        be released on bail in connection with Bounsi P.S. Case No.

                        386 of 2024, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees

                        Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to

                        the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial           Magistrate,

                        Banka/concerned Court, subject to the conditions as

                        mentioned under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C./Section

                        480(3) of BNSS.



                                              (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
veena/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.