Patna High Court

BANTI KUMR @ BANTY KUMAR @ AARYAN RAJversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

Decided: 13 July 2026
Disposal: WITHDRAWN
Bench: RAJ KUMAR

Holding

The bail application was dismissed as withdrawn being infructuous.

Summary

The petitioner, Banti Kumr, was tried and acquitted by the trial court in Gurua P.S. Case No. 381 of 2025. He had filed a bail application which became moot after his acquittal. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the bail application. The court granted permission to withdraw, noting that the application was now infructuous. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

Whether a bail application can be withdrawn after the petitioner has been acquitted

Subjects

bail
withdrawal
acquittal
criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8224 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-381 Year-2025 Thana- GURUA District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 BANTI KUMR @ BANTY KUMAR @ AARYAN RAJ S/O BIRENDRA
                 PRASAD R/O VILLAGE- BIRHIMA, P.S.- GURUA, DIST.- GAYA
                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                           Versus
           1.     THE STATE OF BIHAR PATNA
           2.    A D/O B R/O VILLAGE- C, P.S.- D, DIST.- E
                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Sunil Kumar, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad, APP.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   13-07-2026                    Heard.

                                2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner

                   has submitted that the petitioner faced full fledged trial and

                   ultimately, he has been acquitted by the trial court and the

                   present bail application has become infructuous, hence he seeks

                   permission to withdrawn this bail application.

                                3. Permission is accorded.

                                4. The present application in connection with Gurua

                   P.S. Case No. 381 of 2025 is accordingly, dismissed as

                   withdrawn being infructuous.


                                                 (Raj Kumar, J)

Nirmal/-
U      T

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.