Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Manoj Singh @ Sardar Manoj SinghversusThe Union of India through the Principal Commissioner Customs, C.R Building B.C Patel Path, Patna

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner, finding no sufficient ground to deny it.

Summary

Manoj Singh was arrested in July 2025 in connection with a Directorate of Revenue Intelligence case and a customs economic offence case for alleged smuggling of gold biscuits weighing 1,982.340 grams valued at about Rs. 1.03 crore. He contended that the gold was purchased by his employees and not sourced from abroad, and that it was recovered at Gaya Junction, not an international airport. The customs and DRI authorities opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the alleged smuggling. The court noted the petitioner’s continued custody, the absence of any allegation of evidence tampering, and the nature of the offence, and consequently allowed the bail application. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties who must be blood relatives, along with passport surrender and cooperation in trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a case under Sections 135(1)(a) and 135(1)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Section 3(2) of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992.
  • Whether the circumstances of custody, risk of evidence tampering, and flight risk justify denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • economic offences
  • customs act
  • gold smuggling
  • foreign trade act
  • DRI
  • seizure
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82340 of 2025
                           Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2022 Thana- D.R.I District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Manoj Singh @ Sardar Manoj Singh S/o- Sardar Rameshwar Singh @
                 Rameshwar Singh R/O Mohalla- Sonpati, P.S-Sasaram, District-Rohtas

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
           1.    The Union of India through the Principal Commissioner Customs, C.R
                 Building B.C Patel Path, Patna Bihar
           2.    The Assistant Director, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Regional Unit,
                 Patna Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr.Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the DRI/ Customs     :         Mr. Amit Pandey, Sr. S.C.
                                          :         Mrs. Asmita Sinha, Advocate
                 For the State            :         Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   24-03-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned APP

                   for the State and learned counsel for the Customs and DRI.

                                  2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with DRI PS

                   Case No. 14 of 2022 and Economic Offence (Customs) Case

                   No. 361(C) of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under

                   Sections 135(1)(a) and 135(1)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 read

                   with Section 3(2) of the Foreign Trade (Development and

                   Regulation) Act, 1992.

                                  3. The recovery is of gold biscuits/bullions weighting

                   1982.340 grams valued at Rs. 1,03,45,832 of foreign marking.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82340 of 2025(4) dt.24-03-2026
                                            2/3




                       4. The petitioner is in custody since 10.07.2025.

                       5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          gold was purchased by the petitioner and it is not from a third

          country origin. It was purchased by his employees and it has

          been recovered from Gaya Junction and not from any

          International Airport.

                       6. Learned counsel for the customs and DRI has

          vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that

          the petitioner is involved in smuggling of gold and the value of

          the seized gold is Rs. 1,03,45,832/- and therefore the petitioner

          does not deserve bail.

                       7. I have considered the submissions of the parties.

                       8. Considering the custody of the petitioner, the fact

          that there is no allegation of tampering of evidence, this

          application is allowed.

                       9. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail

          on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

          Special Judge, Economic Offences, Patna/ concerned Court

          below in connection with DRI PS Case No. 14 of 2022 and

          Economic Offence (Customs) Case No. 361(C) of 2022, subject

          to the condition that the both the bailors should be the blood
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82340 of 2025(4) dt.24-03-2026
                                                       3/3




                     relatives of the petitioner. Further, the petitioner shall surrender

                     his passport, if any, at the time of furnishing the bail bonds and

                     shall also co-operate in the trial.


                                                                          (Sandeep Kumar, J)

P. Kumar

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.