Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Makina Khatoon @ Makina KhatunversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82399 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-46 Year-2024 Thana- MAHILA THANA District- Begusarai
                 ======================================================
           1.     Makina Khatoon @ Makina Khatun Wife of Md. Dilsher @ Md. Dilsed @
                  Md. Dilesher Resident of Village - Dhabauli, P.S.- Lakho, District -
                  Begusarai.
           2.    Md. Dilsher @ Md. Dilsed @ Md. Dilesher Son of Md. Kamal Resident of
                 Village - Dhabauli, P.S.- Lakho, District - Begusarai.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Mobina Khatoon Wife of Md. Kismat Resident of Village - Dhabauli, P.S.-
                 Lakho, District - Begusarai.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Pritish Kumar Lal, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms. Gulnar Begum, A.P.P.
                 For the O.P. No. 2       :       Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   30-03-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant

                   and the State.

                                2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in Mahila P. S. Case

                   No. 46 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 65, 89, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and

                   Sections 4, 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences

                   Act.

                                3. As per F.I.R., co-accused Md. Naushad sexually

                   exploited minor daughter of the informant. These petitioners are

                   parents of co-accused Md. Naushad and informant alleges they
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82399 of 2025(3) dt.30-03-2026
                                                          2/2




                        assured her to marry their son with the daughter of informant

                        but later on, refused to do so and aborted the pregnancy by

                        giving her pills.

                                     4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                        petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence.

                        Specific accusation of sexual assault is against co-accused Md.

                        Naushad and there is no allegation of any specific overt act

                        against these petitioners. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

                                     5. Learned counsel for the informant vehemently

                        opposed the bail application.

                                     6. Considering the nature of accusation, gravity of the

                        offence, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is refused.



                                              (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.