Patna High Court
Makina Khatoon @ Makina KhatunversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL REJECTED
- Bench
- PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82399 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-46 Year-2024 Thana- MAHILA THANA District- Begusarai
======================================================
1. Makina Khatoon @ Makina Khatun Wife of Md. Dilsher @ Md. Dilsed @
Md. Dilesher Resident of Village - Dhabauli, P.S.- Lakho, District -
Begusarai.
2. Md. Dilsher @ Md. Dilsed @ Md. Dilesher Son of Md. Kamal Resident of
Village - Dhabauli, P.S.- Lakho, District - Begusarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Mobina Khatoon Wife of Md. Kismat Resident of Village - Dhabauli, P.S.-
Lakho, District - Begusarai.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pritish Kumar Lal, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Gulnar Begum, A.P.P.
For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
3 30-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant
and the State.
2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in Mahila P. S. Case
No. 46 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under
Sections 65, 89, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and
Sections 4, 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences
Act.
3. As per F.I.R., co-accused Md. Naushad sexually
exploited minor daughter of the informant. These petitioners are
parents of co-accused Md. Naushad and informant alleges they
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82399 of 2025(3) dt.30-03-2026
2/2
assured her to marry their son with the daughter of informant
but later on, refused to do so and aborted the pregnancy by
giving her pills.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence.
Specific accusation of sexual assault is against co-accused Md.
Naushad and there is no allegation of any specific overt act
against these petitioners. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.
5. Learned counsel for the informant vehemently
opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the nature of accusation, gravity of the
offence, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is refused.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-
U T
Checking your session…