Patna High Court
Lakhan MahtoversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- PRAVEEN KUMAR
Holding
The Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Summary
Lakhan Mahto filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court challenging an order of the State of Bihar. During the hearing on 18 June 2026, counsel for the petitioner sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The Court, after hearing the parties, granted the request for withdrawal. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn. The judgment expressly states that the Court did not express any opinion on the merits of the underlying dispute.
Issues considered
- Whether the Court should permit the petitioner to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous application
Subjects
- withdrawal of application
- criminal miscellaneous proceedings
- procedural order
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82569 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-160 Year-2018 Thana- BYPASS District- Patna
======================================================
Lakhan Mahto S/o- Late Ramashish Mahto Resident of Village- Jagdamba
Sthan P.S- Town P.S- Hajipur District-Vaishali
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anirudh Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 18-06-2026 Heard the parties.
2. At the very outset, Mr. Anirudh Kumar learned
counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this
application.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
5. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any
opinion on the merits of the case.
(Praveen Kumar, J)
Jyoti/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.