Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Nitish Kumar @ BantiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that bail should be granted subject to strict conditions, despite the gravity of the offences.

Summary

Nitish Kumar Banti was arrested in connection with a murder and kidnapping case (Sections 302 and 365 IPC) arising from an FIR dated 17 April 2024. He has been in custody since 21 May 2025. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent and alleged that the FIR was fabricated, noting that the police investigation had submitted a final report in his favour. The State opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences. The High Court, considering the petitioner’s clean record and the police’s final report, granted bail on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, imposing conditions of cooperation with the trial, non‑tampering with evidence or witnesses, and verification of criminal antecedents.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to an accused of murder and kidnapping when the police investigation report favours the accused and he has a clean antecedent.
  • Whether the lower court’s cognizance was mechanically taken despite the police’s final report.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • murder
  • kidnapping
  • Indian Penal Code
  • criminal antecedent
  • trial cooperation

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82706 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-161 Year-2024 Thana- DIDARGANJ District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Nitish Kumar @ Banti Son of Krishna Singh @ Bhola Singh Village-
                 Gulmahiya Bag PS -Didarganj Distt- Patna

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Jay Ram Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   10-03-2026                  Heard Mr. Jay Ram Prasad, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal, learned Additional

                   Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

                   21.05.2025 in connection with Sessions Trial No.- 1708/2025,

                   (arising out of Didarganj P.S. Case No. 161 of 2024), F.I.R.

                   dated 17.04.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections

                   365/302 of the Indian Penal Code.

                                3. According to prosecution case, petitioner and other

                   co-accused person are alleged to have killed the son of the

                   informant by drowning him in the water.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been

                   implicated in the present case. The allegation as alleged in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82706 of 2025(4) dt.10-03-2026
                                            2/3




          F.I.R is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed

          any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. It appears from the FIR itself

          that the petitioner has been made accused in this case merely on

          the basis of suspicion and the Police after investigation

          submitted final form in favour of the petitioner but the learned

          court below in a mechanical manner has taken cognizance

          against the petitioner vide order dated 30.01.2025 u/s 365 and

          302 of the Indian Penal Code and the petitioner is in custody

          since 21.05.2025.

                       5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State

          has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case and the fact that the petitioner has clean antecedent

          and also the fact that Police after investigation submitted final

          form in favour of the petitioner and learned court below in a

          mechanical manner has taken cognizance against the petitioner,

          let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of

          the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned

          District & Additional Sessions Judge- 1st, Patna City, Patna, in

          connection with Sessions Trial No.- 1708/2025, (arising out of

          Didarganj P.S. Case No. 161 of 2024), subject to the following
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82706 of 2025(4) dt.10-03-2026
                                                        3/3




                      conditions:-

                                   i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

                      properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court

                      and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and

                      on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

                      reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                   ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                      witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

                      for cancellation of bail.

                                   iii. And further condition that the court below shall

                      verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                      any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                      criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                      cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                      acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                      shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                      verification.


                                                     (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

Ranjeet/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.