Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

DR. SANJEEV KUMAR AGRAWAL @ TOLIJEEversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court held that the application is withdrawn, the petitioner may raise all grounds at charge framing, and any interim protection is vacated.

Summary

Dr. Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal filed an application seeking interim protection in a criminal miscellaneous case. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Bipin Kumar, requested to withdraw the application and sought liberty to raise all grounds at the stage of framing of charge. The court, after hearing counsel for the petitioner, respondent No.2 and the State, allowed the withdrawal of the application and directed that any future application be heard by the lower court in accordance with Supreme Court precedent. The court vacated any interim protection previously granted to the petitioner. It ordered that a copy of the order be communicated to the Principal District Judge, Begusarai, so that the case may proceed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the application for interim protection
  • Whether the petitioner can raise all grounds at the stage of framing of charge
  • Whether the interim protection, if any, should be vacated

Subjects

  • interim protection
  • withdrawal of application
  • charge framing
  • high court order
  • criminal miscellaneous

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83026 of 2019
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1243 Year-2019 Thana- BEGUSARAI COMPLAINT CASE
                                                   District- Begusarai
                 ======================================================
                 DR. SANJEEV KUMAR AGRAWAL @ TOLIJEE S/o Late Arvind Kumar
                 Agrawal R/o Mungeriganj, Arbind Shobha Memorial Dental Hospital,
                 Kadhag Narayan Road, Muigeriganj, P.S.- Nagar, Post and District- Begusarai

                                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Prakash Kumar Agrawal S/o Late Sukhdev Narayan Agrawal R/o Mohalla-
                 Mungeriganj, P.N. Bazar and Jwelers, Main Road, Mungeriganj, P.S.- Nagar,
                 District- Begusarai

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s      :      Mr.Bipin Kumar, Advocate
                 For the O.P. No. 2        :      Mr. Ansul, Sr. Advocate
                 For the State             :      Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   19-01-2026                          Heard Mr. Bipin Kumar, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner, Mr. Ansul, learned Senior Counsel for O.P. No. 2 and

                   Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw this application

                   with liberty to the petitioner to raise all the grounds at the stage of

                   framing of charge.

                                 3. If such an application is filed, the same shall be

                   heard and considered by the learned court below in view of the

                   law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of

                   Kanchan Kumar vs. State of Bihar reported in (2022) 9 SCC 577
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83026 of 2019(3) dt.19-01-2026
                                                          2/2




                        and accordingly a reasoned order shall be passed.

                                     4. The interim protection, if any, granted to the

                        petitioner, is hereby vacated.

                                     5. Let a copy of this order be communicated to Principal

                        District Judge, Begusarai through FAX so that the case will

                        proceed further.



                                                   (Sandeep Kumar, J)
tusharika/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.