Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. Gafoor @ Md. GafurversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to conditions prescribed under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Gafoor, was arrested in connection with a land‑related dispute that allegedly led to the assault and subsequent death of the informant's husband. The prosecution alleged offences under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., while the defence argued that the death was natural, as indicated by the post‑mortem report showing no external injuries and a cause of cardio‑respiratory failure. The petitioner claimed innocence, a clean antecedent, and that the case was fabricated by the informant. The State opposed bail but accepted the post‑mortem findings. Considering the natural cause of death, the petitioner’s clean record, the filing of the charge‑sheet, and the period of custody, the court granted bail subject to conditions under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S. and additional safeguards.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite being charged under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.
  • Whether the natural cause of death as per the post‑mortem report negates the seriousness of the alleged offence for bail purposes

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • natural death
  • post‑mortem report
  • land dispute
  • clean antecedent
  • Section 480
  • Section 103
  • Section 3
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83136 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2025 Thana- LAUKAHA District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Gafoor @ Md. Gafur Son of Md. Dukhiya @ Md. Dukhi R/o Village -
                 Kamalpur, P.S. - Laukaha, District - Madhubani.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s

                                                       Versus

                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Tapeshwar Sharma, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   11-02-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                02. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in

                   connection with Laukaha P.S. Case No. 107 of 2025 registered

                   for the alleged offences under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of B.N.S.

                                03. As per prosecution case, the petitioner and other

                   co-accused persons, in the background of dispute over drainage

                   of dirty water on the land of the informant, assaulted the

                   husband of the informant making him unconscious. When the

                   husband of the informant was taken to Primary Health Centre,

                   he was referred to Sadar Hospital, Madhubani and the husband

                   of the informant died while being taken to the hospital.

                                04. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83136 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

          case. The prosecution case is palpably false and concocted and

          the husband of the informant died a natural death. This fact has

          come in the postmortem report which also shows there was no

          sign of any external injury on the person of the husband of the

          informant. Land dispute is admitted and for this reason, taking

          the advance of death of her husband, the informant has made

          accused this petitioner along with his other family members.

          The petitioner is having clean antecedent. The petitioner is in

          custody since 23.07.2025 and charge sheet has been submitted.

                       05. Learned APP opposes the submission made on

          behalf of the petitioner. However, learned APP very fairly

          submits that in the postmortem report the doctor has opined the

          death occurred due to cardio respiratory failure (natural).

                       06. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

          submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          cause of death as given in the postmortem report and also

          considering the period of custody of the petitioner, his clean

          antecedent and submission of charge sheet, the petitioner above

          named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds

          of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Jhanjharpur,
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83136 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                                        3/3




                      District - Madhubani/concerned Court in connection with

                      Laukaha P.S. Case No. 107 of 2025, subject to the conditions

                      mentioned in Section 480(3) of B.N.S.S. and also the following

                      conditions :

                                              (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative

                                              of the petitioner.

                                              (ii) The petitioner will remain present on

                                              each and every date fixed by the court below.

                                              (iii) In case of absence on three consecutive

                                              dates or in violation of the terms of the bail,

                                              the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable

                                              to be cancelled by the court concerned.



                                                (Arun Kumar Jha, J)

    DKS/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.