Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Yogendra Noniya @ Yogindra NoniyaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

The court held that bail could not be granted due to the serious nature of the allegations and the alleged admission by the petitioner.

Summary

Petitioner Yogendra Noniya applied for bail in a murder case (Kasma P.S. Case No. 57 of 2025) where he is accused, along with others, of killing the father of the informant. The prosecution alleges the murder occurred near an under‑construction house and cites a mobile‑phone recording in which the petitioner allegedly admits the killing. The petitioner contends he is falsely implicated, citing lack of eyewitnesses, no incriminating material recovered, and a family land‑dispute motive. The court, considering the seriousness of the charge and the alleged admission, declined to grant bail and ordered the trial court to expedite the trial. Consequently, the bail petition was dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in view of the serious nature of the murder allegation and the alleged mobile‑phone admission
  • Whether the evidence presented by the prosecution justifies denial of bail

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S. — s. 103, 3(5), 61(2)

Subjects

  • bail
  • murder
  • false implication
  • mobile phone evidence
  • serious offence
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83281 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2025 Thana- KASMA District- Aurangabad
                 ======================================================
                 Yogendra Noniya @ Yogindra Noniya S/O Late Arjun Noniya R/O Village-
                 Arthua Chatti, P.S- Kasma, Distt.- Aurangabad.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s

                                                        Versus

                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mrs.Mukul Kumari, Advocate
                 For the State            :        Mr.Surendra Kumar, APP
                 For the Informant        :        Mr. Md. Javed Jafar Khan, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   11-02-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf

                   of the petitioner.

                                 02. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in

                   connection with Kasma P.S. Case No. 57 of 2025 registered for

                   the alleged offences under Sections 103, 61(2), 3(5) of B.N.S.

                                 03. As per prosecution case, the father of the

                   informant was murdered while sleeping near the under

                   construction house of the informant. The name of the petitioner,

                   who is the brother of the informant, along with other co-accused

                   persons transpired during investigation for being involved in the

                   murder of the father of the informant.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83281 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                            2/3




                       04. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

          case and no occurrence as alleged has ever taken place. There

          was dispute between the petitioner and his father for partition of

          land but he has not committed his murder and in order to grab

          the share of the petitioner, the informant brother has lodged this

          false case. There is no eye witness to the alleged occurrence and

          the petitioner has been dragged in this case merely on suspicion.

          The dead body of the father of the informant has been lying near

          an under construction house which was an open place and

          anybody       might      have     committed          the   murder.   Nothing

          incriminating has been recovered from the person or possession

          of the petitioner. The petitioner is having clean antecedent and

          he is in custody since 11.07.2025. Charge sheet has been

          submitted.

                       05. Learned APP as well as learned counsel appearing

          on behalf of the informant vehemently oppose the submission

          made on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the

          informant submits that this petitioner admitted killing of his

          father on a mobile call with his sister and the sister of the

          petitioner produced the mobile phone and its recording to the

          police official.
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83281 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                                        3/3




                                   06. Having regard to the serious nature of allegation, I

                      am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and hence, his

                      prayer for bail is rejected.

                                   07. Learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial

                      and conclude it at the earliest.



                                                (Arun Kumar Jha, J)

    DKS/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.