Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that bail must be granted as the victim’s statement under Section 183 does not substantiate the kidnapping allegation.

Summary

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping allegation under sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. The FIR, lodged a day after the alleged incident, claimed that he and others abducted the informant’s minor daughter, but the victim, who was over 17, later gave a statement under Section 183 of the BNSS stating that no kidnapping occurred. The petitioner argued that the accusation was false and that the delay in filing the FIR and the victim’s statement warranted bail. The State opposed the bail application. Considering the victim’s statement, the lack of supporting evidence, and the pending charge‑sheet, the court ordered that the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the kidnapping allegation.
  • Whether the one‑day delay in lodging the FIR affects the grant of bail.
  • Whether the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the BNSS negates the kidnapping charge.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • kidnapping
  • false accusation
  • victim statement
  • Section 183
  • criminal procedure
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83302 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-598 Year-2025 Thana- VAISHALI District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Rohit Kumar S/o- Late Arun Sahni Resident Of Village- Nagma, Ps- Belsar,
                 Dist-Vaishali At Hajipur

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Anil Sahni S/o- Late Rameshwar Sahni R/v- Nagma Chakwaja PO-
                 Chakwaja, Nagma PS- Belsar Dist- Vaishali

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Sachin Kumar, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Ajay Kumar Jha, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   19-02-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State. No one appears on behalf of opposite party

                   no.2 despite valid service of notice.

                                  2. A prayer for bail has been made on behalf of the

                   petitioner in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case no.598 of 2025

                   registered under sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of BNS, 2023.

                                3. Allegation in the F.I.R is that petitioner along with

                   others kidnapped the informant’s minor daughter.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner along with his family have been falsely made accused

                   for kidnapping the daughter of the informant. There is delay of

                   one day in lodging of the F.I.R. It would be apparent from the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83302 of 2025(3) dt.19-02-2026
                                                        2/2




                      bail rejection order as also from the F.I.R itself that victim is

                      more than 17 years old girl and after recovery of the victim her

                      statement was recorded under Section 183 BNSS wherein she

                      has clearly stated that nobody has kidnapped her and as a matter

                      of fact she went to her grand-mother’s house after being scolded

                      by her mother. The petitioner is in custody since 17.08.2025 and

                      undertakes to cooperate in the case/trial.

                                   5. The application for bail is opposed by learned

                      A.P.P. for the State.

                                   6. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and

                      circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that

                      victim has not supported the factum of the kidnapping under

                      Section 183 of BNSS and charge-sheet has been submitted in

                      the case, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in

                      connection with Vaishali P.S. Case no.598 of 2025 on furnishing

                      bail bond of        Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

                      sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                      Court concerned where the case is pending/successor Court.


                                                (Soni Shrivastava, J)

Harsh/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.