Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

EjajversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner with conditions, finding no specific allegation against him in the FIR.

Summary

The petitioner, Ejaz, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case (Thakurganj P.S. Case No. 174 of 2025) involving alleged robbery, extortion, and theft of cattle, charged under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. The prosecution alleged that a group of persons intercepted a cattle transport, stole money, locked the driver, demanded a ransom, and seized the cattle, naming the petitioner as one of the accused. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR contains no specific allegation against him, and pointed to prior anticipatory bail orders granted to co‑accused in related matters. The State opposed the bail. After hearing both sides, the court decided to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, a surrender within four weeks, and a condition that he not commit similar offences, invoking Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. for the order.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under the applicable provisions despite the serious nature of the offences alleged.
  • Whether the allegations in the FIR specifically implicate the petitioner, justifying denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • criminal procedure
  • robbery
  • extortion
  • cattle theft
  • Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act
  • bail conditions
  • Section 482

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8332 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2025 Thana- THAKURGANJ District- Kishanganj
                 ======================================================
                 Ejaj S/O Md Ataur Rahman Resident of Vill.- Duadangi Lohagara, P.S-
                 Bahadurganj, Dist- Kishanganj

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   09-02-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been

                   filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with

                   Thakurganj P.S. Case No. 174 of 2025 instituted for the offence

                   under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 308(2), 308(5), 303(2),

                   352 and 3(5) of B.N.S. and Section 11(1) (I) of Prevention of

                   Cruelty to Animals Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that while

                   the informant was carrying cattle on a truck, he was intercepted

                   by 10-12 persons on three cars and it is alleged that they took

                   Rs. 1500/- from his pocket, locked him in a room near toll plaza

                   and demanded Rs. 1 Lakh as randari. It is further alleged that

                   the accused persons were naming this petitioner and one Jawarul
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8332 of 2026(2) dt.09-02-2026
                                            2/3




          Sarpanch. From the perusal of the F.I.R., it is also clear that the

          accused persons have also taken away the cattle from the truck.

          When the owner of the cattle was informed, he informed the

          police whereupon, the police arrived and the cattle were

          recovered from the village.

                       4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

          petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

          committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

          case. From perusal of the F.I.R., it is clear that there is no

          specific allegation against the petitioner. It has also been

          submitted that the person from whose possession, cattle were

          recovered, has been granted anticipatory bail by learned Co-

          ordinate Bench vide Cr. Misc. No. 91343 of 2025. Similarly co-

          accused has been granted bail by this court in Cr. Misc. No. 1373

          of 2026.

                       Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer of

          bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in

          the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this

          Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with a

          condition that the petitioner shall not indulge in similar

          nature of offence in future. The petitioner is directed to
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8332 of 2026(2) dt.09-02-2026
                                                        3/3




                      surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from

                      today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection

                      with Thakurganj P.S. Case No. 174 of 2025, he will be enlarged

                      on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten

                      thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                      satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Kishanganj subject to the

                      conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of B.N.S.S.



                                             (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Shubham/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.