Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Nitish Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court exercised its discretion to permit the withdrawal of the application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Nitish Kumar Yadav filed an application in the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous matter. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The court considered the request and granted permission for withdrawal. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case were addressed.

Issues considered

  • What is the court's discretion to allow a party to withdraw an application pending before it?

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • procedural discretion
  • criminal miscellaneous proceedings
  • Patna High Court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83392 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-187 Year-2023 Thana- SINDHIYA District- Samastipur
                  ======================================================
                  Nitish Kumar Yadav Son of Fulo Yadav Resident of Village- Behat, P.S.-
                  Singhia, District- Samastipur

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
            1.    The State of Bihar Patna
            2.    Priyanka Kumari Wife of Nitish Kumar Yadav Resident of Village- Behat,
                  P.S.- Singhia, District- Samastipur

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Ms. Rani Shashi Bharti, Advocate
                                                    Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1
                  For the Informant        :        Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                        ORAL ORDER

4    18-06-2026                   Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

                    learned counsel for the State.

                                  2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner

                    seeks permission to withdraw this application.

                                  3. Permission is accorded.

                                  4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.



                                                    (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.