Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dinesh PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

An anticipatory bail application may be withdrawn at the petitioner's request, and the Court may dismiss it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Dinesh Prasad, was implicated in a criminal case (PS Case No. 407 of 2025) and filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court. He later approached the Court seeking permission to withdraw that application. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested the withdrawal, and the State’s counsel and the informant’s counsel were present. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh considered whether the Court could permit the petitioner to retract his anticipatory bail plea. The Court held that a petitioner may withdraw an anticipatory bail application and granted the request. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn by the petitioner upon request

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • bail
  • High Court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83454 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-407 Year-2025 Thana- HILSA District- Nalanda
                  ======================================================
                  Dinesh Prasad S/o Late Durga Mahto R/o Village - Yarpur, P.S - Hilsa,
                  District - Nalanda

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus

                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner      :        Mr. Bhola Kumar , Advocate
                  For the State           :        Mr. Yogendra Kumar, APP
                  For the Informant       :        Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj, Advocate
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    09-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                    petitioner, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and

                    learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

                                 2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf

                    of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory

                    bail application.

                                 3. Permission, as prayed for, is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application

                    stands dismissed as withdrawn.



                                          (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
shashank/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.