Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Suraj Kumar @ Raj Gurjar Khurana @ Raj Gurjan Khurana @ Raj Gujjar KhuranaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
REJECTED

Holding

The bail petition was dismissed, and the accused was not released on bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, was arrested on 11 March 2022 in connection with a POCSO case involving alleged offences under Sections 366(A), 323, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. He sought bail, claiming a clean antecedent, but his earlier bail application had been rejected. The trial court had completed examination of all prosecution witnesses and recorded the accused’s statement under Section 313 of the CrPC. Both the informant’s counsel and the Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail. The High Court, considering the serious nature of the allegations and the stage of the trial, refused the bail petition and directed the trial court to expedite the proceedings.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a POCSO case involving multiple serious offences under the IPC and POCSO Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • POCSO
  • sexual assault
  • IPC
  • special court
  • trial expeditious
  • bail refusal

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83731 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2022 Thana- NATHNAGAR District- Bhagalpur
                 ======================================================
                 Suraj Kumar @ Raj Gurjar Khurana @ Raj Gurjan Khurana @ Raj Gujjar
                 Khurana S/O Bajrangi Das R/O village - Venukanu Lane Champanagar, P.S. -
                 Nathnagar, Dist. - Bhagalpur
                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
           1.     The State of Bihar
           2.     Geeta Devi W/O Ghanshyam Das R/O village - Gopinath Ghosh Lane
                  Champanagar, P.S. - Nathnagar, Dist. - Bhagalpur
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Davendra Kumar Pandey, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Suresh Prasad Singh, APP
                 For the informant        :      Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   13-02-2026                  Heard         Mr. Davendra Kumar Pandey,                 learned

                   counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Prashant Kumar, learned

                   counsel for the informant and Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh,

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody

                   since 11.03.2022 in connection with POCSO Case No. 254

                   of 2024 arising out of Nathnagar P.S. Case No. 150 of

                   2022, FIR dated 04.03.2022 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 366(A), 323, 504, 506 and 34 of

                   the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of POCSO Act.

                                3. Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was

                   rejected vide order dated 19.07.2023 in Cr. Misc. No. 26366
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83731 of 2025(3) dt.13-02-2026
                                            2/3




          of 2023.

                       4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

          submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent.

                       5. Vide order dated 22.12.2025, a report was

          called for with regard to the present stage of trial. Report of

          learned Trial Court dated 05.01.2026 reveals that all the

          prosecution witnesses have been examined in the present

          case and on 27.01.2026 the statement of the accused under

          Section 313 of the Cr.P.C. has been recorded.

                       6. Learned counsel for the informant and learned

          A.P.P. for the State have vehemently opposed the prayer for

          bail of the petitioner.

                       7. Considering the nature of allegation against the

          petitioner as alleged in the FIR as well as the report of the

          learned Trial Court, I am not inclined to enlarge the

          petitioner on bail in connection with POCSO Case No. 254

          of 2024 arising out of Nathnagar P.S. Case No. 150 of 2022

          pending in the court of learned Exclusive Special Court of

          POCSO-cum-District and Additional Sessions Judge-VI,

          Bhagalpur.

                       8. Prayer is refused.
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83731 of 2025(3) dt.13-02-2026
                                                      3/3




                                 9. However, learned Trial Court is directed to

                    expedite the trial and conclude the same at the earliest.


                                                              (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Ankit Kumar/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.