Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Baijnath Yadav @ Baijhnath PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn.

Summary

Baijnath Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court arising from police case No.79 of 2025. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the application. The court considered the request for withdrawal. Permission to withdraw was granted by the bench. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the pending application

Subjects

  • withdrawal
  • application
  • high court
  • criminal miscellaneous

Judgment

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83884 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2025 Thana- KARAI PARSURAI District- Nalanda
                   ======================================================
                   Baijnath Yadav @ Baijhnath Prasad S/O Late Chandrika Bhagat R/O Village-
                   Pakari, P.S- Karaiparsorai, Distt.- Nalanda.

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
              1.   The State of Bihar
              2.   Vipin Kumar S/O Ramugrah Prasad R/O Village- Pakari, P.S- Karaiparsurai,
                   Distt.- Nalanda.

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party/s
                   ======================================================
                   Appearance :
                   For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Rekha Ranjan Prasad, Advocate
                   For the Opposite Party/s :       Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam, APP
                   ======================================================
                   CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                         ORAL ORDER

2    06-01-2026                       After some arguments, learned counsel for the

                     petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present application.

                                  2. Permission is granted.

                                  3. This application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                (Soni Shrivastava, J)
Harsh/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.