Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Gouri Shankar Rai @ Gauri Ray @ Gauri Shankar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to bond and conditions prescribed under the B.N.S.S., 2023.

Summary

The petitioners, Gouri Shankar Rai and Jay Narayan Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Warisanagar PS Case No. 238 of 2025) alleging assault and other offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleges that on 7 September 2025 the accused entered the informant's house and assaulted her husband, causing injuries. The petitioners contend they are innocent, asserting a land dispute and that both sides have filed cases and counter‑cases, with injuries being simple. The State opposed bail, highlighting the seriousness of the charges and prior criminal antecedents of the petitioners. After hearing both sides, the Court granted anticipatory bail subject to a Rs.30,000 bond and conditions under Sections 2(1)(d) and 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 in view of the alleged offences and the surrounding facts.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • criminal procedure
  • assault
  • land dispute
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8413 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-238 Year-2025 Thana- WARISNAGAR District- Samastipur
                 ======================================================
           1.     Gouri Shankar Rai @ Gauri Ray @ Gauri Shankar Yadav S/O Late Triveni
                  Ray R/O Village- Chandauli, P.S- Warisnagar, Dist.- Samastipur.
           2.    Jay Narayan Ray S/O Jogendra Ray R/O Village- Chandauli, P.S-
                 Warisnagar, Dist.- Samastipur.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms. Suman Kumari Singh, A.P.P
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   01-04-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in

                   connection with Warisnagar P.S. Case No. 238 of 2025 lodged

                   on 08.09.2025, for the offence punishable under Sections

                   126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) & 3(5) of the

                   Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

                                3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against

                   eight named accused persons including the present petitioners

                   and 20-25 unknown persons. It has been alleged by the

                   informant that on 07.09.2025 at about 10 p.m, all the accused

                   persons came and entered in her house and assaulted her
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8413 of 2026(3) dt.01-04-2026
                                            2/3




          husband brutally due to which injury has been caused.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the

          petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence.

          Counsel submits that the petitioner’s side and the informant’s

          side are agnates and land dispute is going on between them.

          Counsel further submits that for the same date and place of

          occurrence, there are case and counter case from both the sides

          and injuries have been caused to both the sides. Counsel further

          submits that the petitioners have one criminal antecedent each in

          which, they are on bail. He further submits that the petitioners

          are ready to fulfill all the conditions whatsoever shall be

          imposed upon them.

                       5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          bail of the petitioners but fairly submits that for the same date

          and place of occurrence, there are case and counter case from

          both the sides. He further submits that on previous occasion,

          case diary as well as injury report has been called for. From the

          injury report, it transpires that the injuries are simple in nature.

                       6. As such, in the present facts and circumstances of

          this case, let the above named petitioners be released on

          anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the

          Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8413 of 2026(3) dt.01-04-2026
                                                         3/3




                       bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) each as

                       mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 to the

                       satisfaction of J.M. 1st Class, Samastipur, in connection with

                       Warisnagar P.S. Case No. 238 of 2025, subject to the conditions

                       as laid down U/s 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023.



                                                                      (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Divyansh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.