Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sanjay Ram @ Sanjay DasversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court held that bail should be granted to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Sanjay Ram, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326, 504, 147, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have thrown a bomb and fired at an informant, causing injuries. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserted that the injuries were superficial, and highlighted his clean criminal record while he had been in judicial custody since 2 September 2025. The State opposed the bail application, arguing the seriousness of the offences. After hearing both sides, the Patna High Court considered the nature of the injuries, lack of antecedents, and the principle of bail. The Court ordered that the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, thereby granting the bail petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner accused of offences under the IPC and the Arms Act.
  • Whether the nature of the alleged injuries and the petitioner’s clean record justify bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Indian Penal Code
  • Arms Act
  • criminal procedure
  • Patna High Court
  • Saran district
  • injury assessment

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84229 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-333 Year-2023 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Sanjay Ram @ Sanjay Das S/O Munni Lal Ram R/O Village- Narayanpur,
                 Police Station- Garkha, District- Saran.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Mani Shankar Mishra, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Nagendra Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   19-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Garkha P.S. Case No. 333 of 2023 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326, 504, 147,

                   148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms

                   Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the

                   petitioner has thrown a bomb on the wall and the father of the

                   informant got injured. It is further alleged that the petitioner has

                   fired at the informant.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

                   committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84229 of 2025(4) dt.19-02-2026
                                                         2/2




                       case. From perusal of the injury report of the informant it will

                       transpire that the informant has received two lacerated wound

                       measuring 1/4” x 1/4”x 1/4” at lumber region. It has further

                       been submitted that though the injuries are said to be caused by

                       gunshot, the nature of injury is simple and the injuries are

                       superficial one which is clear from the dimensions of the injury.

                       Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing

                       in judicial custody since 02.09.2025.

                                    5. Learned APP appearing for the State has

                       vehemently opposed the application for bail.

                                    6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                       considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                       inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                       petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                       bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                       of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial

                       Magistrate 1st Class, Saran at Chapra in connection with Garkha

                       P.S. Case No. 333 of 2023.


                                                       (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

lata/-
U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.