Patna High Court
Ajay YadavversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Holding
The court granted permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, dismissing it as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioners, Ajay Yadav and Sanjay Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case arising from a police station case No.246, 2025, Nawada district. They later approached the court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, made the request, while the State was represented by Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, APP. The court examined the request and considered whether a petitioner may withdraw an anticipatory bail application. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh held that the petitioners were entitled to withdraw their application and granted the permission. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioners may withdraw their anticipatory bail application
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- withdrawal
- bail
- criminal procedure
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84271 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-246 Year-2025 Thana- PAKARIBARAW District- Nawada
======================================================
1. Ajay Yadav Son of Sukhdeo Yadav Both Are Resident Of Village -
Hasanganj, P.S. - Pakribrawan, District - Nawada.
2. Sanjay Yadav Son of Sukhdeo Yadav Both Are Resident Of Village -
Hasanganj, P.S. - Pakribrawan, District - Nawada.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioners : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
2 09-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf
of the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory
bail application.
3. Permission, as prayed for, is accorded.
4. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application
stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
shashank/-
U T
Checking your session…