Patna High Court
Md. Sajid Ansari @ Raja @ Md. Sajad @ SajadversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
The court held that the application may be withdrawn following the petitioner’s acquittal and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Md. Sajid Ansari, was involved in a criminal proceeding (Criminal Miscellaneous No.84284 of 2025) before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the case, an application was filed before the court, the nature of which is not specified in the record. The petitioner subsequently informed the court that he had been acquitted of the charges and therefore sought permission to withdraw the pending application. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested that the court allow the withdrawal, arguing that the acquittal rendered the application moot. Justice Sandeep Kumar, after hearing both sides, granted the petitioner's request and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether a pending application before the court can be withdrawn after the petitioner has been acquitted
Subjects
- withdrawal of application
- acquittal
- criminal procedure
- court order
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84284 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-806 Year-2024 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR SADAR District-
Muzaffarpur
======================================================
Md. Sajid Ansari @ Raja @ Md. Sajad @ Sajad S/o- Md. Maksud Ansari
Vill- Pirakhpur, P.S- Bochaha, Dist- Muzaffarpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brajesh Kumar Singh
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 31-01-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned counsel for the State.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very
outset, submits that the petitioner has been acquitted and hence,
he seeks permission to withdraw this application.
3. Permission, as prayed, is granted.
4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-
U T
Checking your session…