Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. Sajid Ansari @ Raja @ Md. Sajad @ SajadversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court held that the application may be withdrawn following the petitioner’s acquittal and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Sajid Ansari, was involved in a criminal proceeding (Criminal Miscellaneous No.84284 of 2025) before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the case, an application was filed before the court, the nature of which is not specified in the record. The petitioner subsequently informed the court that he had been acquitted of the charges and therefore sought permission to withdraw the pending application. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested that the court allow the withdrawal, arguing that the acquittal rendered the application moot. Justice Sandeep Kumar, after hearing both sides, granted the petitioner's request and dismissed the application as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a pending application before the court can be withdrawn after the petitioner has been acquitted

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • acquittal
  • criminal procedure
  • court order

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84284 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-806 Year-2024 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR SADAR District-
                                                        Muzaffarpur
                  ======================================================
                  Md. Sajid Ansari @ Raja @ Md. Sajad @ Sajad S/o- Md. Maksud Ansari
                  Vill- Pirakhpur, P.S- Bochaha, Dist- Muzaffarpur

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :     Mr. Brajesh Kumar Singh
                  For the Opposite Party/s :     Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    31-01-2026                  Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

                    learned counsel for the State.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very

                    outset, submits that the petitioner has been acquitted and hence,

                    he seeks permission to withdraw this application.

                                 3. Permission, as prayed, is granted.

                                 4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.



                                                  (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.