Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sahil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to strict conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Sahil Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, alleged to have occurred at a petrol pump where he and others were accused of snatching cash and a mobile phone. The prosecution’s case relied primarily on the confessional statement of a co-accused, Pritam Paswan, and no incriminating articles were recovered from the petitioner’s possession, nor was a third information report conducted. The petitioner argued that the FIR was initially filed against unknown persons and that his identification was solely based on the co-accused’s confession, contending that this did not justify denial of bail. The State opposed bail, emphasizing the seriousness of the offence. The court, after considering the lack of direct evidence and the fact that co-accused had already been granted bail, ordered the petitioner’s release on bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 and several conditions, including regular court attendance and police monitoring. The order expressly stated that the observations made would not affect the trial proceedings.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted in a robbery case under Section 392 IPC when the primary evidence against the accused is a co-accused’s confessional statement and no material evidence has been seized.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • robbery
  • Section 392 IPC
  • confessional statement
  • co-accused
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84577 of 2025
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-318 Year-2023 Thana- CHIRAIYA District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Sahil Kumar S/O Vikram Paswan @ Surjit Paswan R/O Vill.- Harihara, P.S.-
                 Shikarganj, Dist.- East Champaran.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Choubey Jawahar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   05-01-2026                    Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in

                   connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 318 of 2023

                   registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of

                   the Indian Penal Code.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, the informant has

                   alleged that while he was present at a petrol pump, four

                   miscreants arrived on two motorcycles. One of the

                   miscreants fired a shot and at the point of a pistol, the

                   accused persons snatched Rs. 40,000/- and the mobile

                   phone of the informant.

                                4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84577 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026
                                            2/4




          that the F.I.R. was registered against unknown persons and

          that the petitioner’s name has subsequently transpired solely

          on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused,

          namely, Pritam Paswan. It is further submitted that no

          incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious

          possession of the petitioner and that till date no T.I.P has

          been conducted. It is also submitted that the co-accused

          persons, namely, Chandan Thakur and Pritam Paswan, have

          already been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this

          Hon’ble Court vide order dated 18.10.2023 passed in Cr.

          Misc. No. 68140 of 2023 and vide order dated 12.02.2025

          passed in Cr. Misc. No. 4843 of 2025 respectively.

                       5. The learned A.P.P. has vehemently opposed the

          prayer for bail.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid submission, facts and

          circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named,

          be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

          (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to

          the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is

          pending/successor court in connection Chiraiya P.S. Case

          No. 318 of 2023 subject to the following conditions:-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84577 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026
                                            3/4




                       (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his

          close relative and the other shall be local resident.

                       (ii) The petitioner shall remain physically present

          in Court on each date of the trial.

                       (iii) In case of absence on two consecutive dates

          or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the

          petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court

          concerned.

                       (iv) If the petitioner is found involved in similar

          nature of offence in future, the prosecution shall be at

          liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

                       (v) The learned Court below shall verify the

          criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage

          it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal

          antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation

          of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of

          bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not

          be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

                       (vi) In view of the antecedent of the petitioner, the

          petitioner is directed to appear before the Superintendent of

          Police, East Champaran, Motihari within fifteen days of his
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84577 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026
                                                           4/4




                         release with a copy of this order and every two weeks

                         thereafter for the next nine months. The conduct of the

                         petitioner will be kept under watch in this period by the

                         Superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found

                         wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court

                         concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation

                         of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the

                         Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the

                         petitioner before the court concerned.

                                      7. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is allowed.

                                      8. It is made clear that the observation, if any,

                         made in this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial.



                                                  (Sourendra Pandey, J)
aditya/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.