Patna High Court
Jitendra Kumar @ Steel YadavversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL REJECTED
- Bench
- RAJIV ROY
Holding
The anticipatory bail application is rejected as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, fearing arrest in connection with PS Salaiya Case No. 55 of 2025. While the matter was pending, the petitioner was actually arrested. Counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that, given the arrest, the petitioner wished to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition. The Court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn. Consequently, no anticipatory bail was granted.
Issues considered
- Whether an anticipatory bail application can be entertained when the petitioner is already in custody
- Whether the petitioner may withdraw the anticipatory bail application after arrest
Legislation cited
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- withdrawal of application
- criminal procedure
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8463 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-55 Year-2025 Thana- SALAIYA District- Aurangabad
======================================================
Jitendra Kumar @ Steel Yadav S/O Naresh Yadav R/O Vill.- Gajraj bigha,
P.S.- Salaiya, Dist.- Aurangabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Aman Vishal, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gulnar Begum, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
2 17-02-2026 Heard Mr. Aman Vishal, learned counsel for the petitioner
and the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with
Salaiya P.S. Case No. 55 of 2025 for the offence registered under
sections 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act,
2022.
3. It has been informed by learned counsel that the
petitioner stands arrested and as such, he may be permitted to
withdraw the petition.
4. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is rejected
as withdrawn.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Vijay Singh/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.