Patna High Court
Md. Nanhe ShekhversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Holding
Anticipatory bail is to be granted to the petitioner on the basis of clean antecedents and the likelihood of false implication.
Summary
The petitioner, Md. Nanhe Shekh, was arrested in a case alleging multiple IPC offences including assault, robbery, and attempted rape, as well as offences under the POCSO Act. He contended that the charges were fabricated as retaliation in a land‑dispute with the informant, whose mother had previously sought land demarcation. The petitioner submitted that his family faced threats and that the case was lodged to harass them after the demarcation process. The State and the informant opposed the petition for anticipatory bail, citing the seriousness of the alleged crimes. Considering the petitioner’s clean antecedents, the alleged motive of false implication, and the material on record, the court granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted despite the gravity of the offences alleged under the IPC and POCSO Act
- Whether the claim of false implication arising from a land dispute warrants bail
- Whether Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. empowers the High Court to discharge the petitioner on anticipatory bail
Legislation cited
- B.N.S.S. — s. 482(2)
- Indian Penal Code — s. 323, 34, 341, 354B, 376, 379, 504, 506, 511
- Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act — s. 4, 6
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- false implication
- land dispute
- IPC offences
- POCSO Act
- clean antecedents
- Section 482
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.847 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-199 Year-2025 Thana- TARIYANI CHOWK District- Sheohar
======================================================
Md. Nanhe Shekh S/o- Md. Safaula Shekh @ Safaul Shekh R/v- Kolsokala
Ps- Tariyani Dist- Sheohar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. X D/o- Late Majibul Rahman R/v- Kolsokala Ps- Tariyani Dist- Sheohar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Krishna Prabhat, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP
For the Informant : Mr. Manoj Kumar Madhukar, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
3 17-02-2026 Heard learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of
the petitioner, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and
learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant/Opposite
Party No. 2.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323,
379, 354B, 504, 506, 376, 511 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code
and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act.
3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that this
petitioner, finding the informant alone at home, entered into her
house, put a knife on her throat and tried to commit rape upon
her. It is further alleged that when mother of informant came,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.847 of 2026(3) dt.17-02-2026
2/4
this petitioner, along with other accused persons, assaulted
informant and her mother, snatched their mobile phone and fled
away.
4. It is submitted by learned senior counsel appearing
on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and
has committed no offence. Petitioner has falsely been implicated
in this case due to land dispute between the parties. As a matter
of fact, mother of informant/Opposite Party No. 2 herself filed
an application before the Circle Officer, Tariyani, seeking
demarcation of land and pursuant thereto, father of this
petitioner was served with a notice dated 16.09.2025 directing
him to appear before the Circle Office along with his claim for
demarcation on 20.09.2025. In compliance of the aforesaid
notice, father of this petitioner appeared before the Circle
Officer, Tariyani on 20.09.2025 and submitted a written
application stating therein that the family members of
informant/Opposite Party No. 2 is threatening him to falsely
implicate him and his family members in false rape case and he
also requested the Circle Officer to conduct an on-spot
inspection of the land in question. Copy of the application dated
20.09.2025 is Annexure-P3 to this bail application. Upon
receiving no objection from both the parties, the Anchal Ameen
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.847 of 2026(3) dt.17-02-2026
3/4
duly visited the land and conducted an on spot inspection and
proper demarcation of land. The Anchal Ameen properly
bifurcated the land and the access road and explained the same
to both the parties and after completion of the demarcation, he
submitted his report before the Circle Officer, Tariyani.
However, after completion of the demarcation process, when the
petitioner and his family members started using the access road,
the informant/Opposite Party No. 2 again started obstructing the
road and an altercation took place between the parties and only
with a view to harass and humiliate the petitioner and his family
members, this false and concocted case has been lodged on
25.09.2025. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State and
learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the
prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the
case, materials available on record and clean antecedents of the
petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the
petitioner is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within
a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named
petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.847 of 2026(3) dt.17-02-2026
4/4
10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount
each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge,
POCSO, Sheohar in connection with Tariyani P.S. Case No. 199
of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2)
of the B.N.S.S..
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
shashank/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.