Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Suraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that the petitioner is entitled to regular bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to standard conditions.

Summary

Suraj Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging theft and sale of stolen motorcycles, charged under several sections of the BNS, 2023. The prosecution claimed he was caught while attempting to flee and that two stolen motorcycles were recovered, with the petitioner allegedly confessing. The petitioner pleaded innocence, arguing that no contraband was found on him and that a co-accused had already been granted bail. The State opposed the bail application. The court considered the facts, the nature of the offences, and the petitioner’s willingness to cooperate, and ordered that he be released on regular bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and complying with standard conditions. The order directed the lower court to release the petitioner on bail.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail in the offences charged under Sections 303(2), 317(5), 338, 336(3) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

Legislation cited

  • BNS, 2023 — s. 303(2), 317(5), 336(3), 338, 3(5)

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • theft of motor vehicles
  • stolen motorcycles
  • BNS 2023
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84754 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-371 Year-2025 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 Suraj Kumar S/O Sahdeo Nat Resident of Village- Jagdhar, P.S.- Tekari, Dist.-
                 Gaya
                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
                 The State of Bihar Patna
                                                                     ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Aryan Singh
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Raj Ballabh Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR
                 PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   20-02-2026                      Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well

                   as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection

                   with Tekari P.S. Case No. 371 of 2025, registered for the

                   offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 317(5), 338, 336(3)

                   and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

                                3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 06.08.2025

                   at about 05:00 PM, while on patrolling duty, the police party of

                   P.S. Tekari received confidential information that the petitioner

                   along with co-accused Niraj Kumar, was searching for

                   customers to sell stolen motorcycles. Acting on the said

                   information, the police reached the house of the petitioner,

                   where he was allegedly apprehended while attempting to flee. It

                   is alleged that two stolen motorcycles were recovered and the
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84754 of 2025(3) dt.20-02-2026
                                                       2/2




                     petitioner allegedly confessed his involvement in the theft and

                     sale of the said vehicles after changing their number plates.

                                  4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

                     that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

                     this case. Nothing was recovered from his possession. He has

                     further submitted that co-accused Niraj Kumar has been granted

                     bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 84249

                     of 2025.

                                  5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has

                     opposed the prayer for bail.

                                  6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and

                     circumstances, let the petitioner above-named, is directed to

                     furnish bail bond and on doing so, the court below shall release

                     the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-

                     with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                     learned CJM, Gaya in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 371

                     of 2025, subject to the following conditions that the petitioner

                     shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself

                     available as and when required by the court.


                                          (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

Nirmal/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.