Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jawed AkhtarversusUnion of India, through Narcotic Control Bureau, Patna Zonal Unit, Patna

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner.

Summary

Petitioner Jawed Akhtar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 21(c), 27A and 29 of the NDPS Act. The prosecution alleged that, based on secret information, an NCB inspector raided a train and seized 90,000 litres of codeine cough syrup. The petitioner was not named in the FIR, no contraband was found in his possession, and he asserted a clean record. The Union of India opposed bail, highlighting the large seizure and a transfer of Rs. 50 lakh into the petitioner’s bank account. After considering the nature of the offence, the volume of the seized narcotics, and the financial link, the Court rejected the petition for anticipatory bail.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the NDPS Act in view of the alleged seizure and alleged financial transaction.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • NDPS Act
  • codeine cough syrup
  • seizure
  • money transfer
  • bail denial
  • narcotics

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84840 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2024 Thana- N.C.B (GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL)
                                                    District- Begusarai
                 ======================================================
                 Jawed Akhtar S/O Sabir Hussain R/O Alflah Colon, Road No. 3, Pgmil, P.S.-
                 Lohsingwa, Distt- Hazaribagh (Jharkhand).

                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
                 Union of India, through Narcotic Control Bureau, Patna Zonal Unit, Patna
                 Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner       :    Mr. N. K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate
                                               Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, Advocate
                 For the Union of India   :    Dr. K. N. Singh, A.S.G.I.
                                               Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, C.G.C.
                                               Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   09-02-2026                  Heard learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of

                   the petitioner and learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of

                   the Union of India.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under Sections 21(c), 27A

                   and 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

                                3. As per prosecution case, on secret information,

                   informant who was Inspector in the Narcotics Control Bureau,

                   Patna, raided a train and recovered 90 thousand liters of codeine

                   cough syrup.

                                4. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits

                   that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence.
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84840 of 2025(2) dt.09-02-2026
                                                         2/2




                       Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.. Name of petitioner

                       transpired in this case during course of investigation. No

                       incriminating article has been recovered from possession of this

                       petitioner. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

                                    5. Learned senior counsel for the Union of India

                       vehemently opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail of

                       the petitioner and submits that huge quantity of codeine cough

                       syrup was recovered and name of petitioner transpired in this

                       case during course of investigation and it has also come that Rs.

                       50,00,000/- was transferred in the account of this petitioner

                       bearing Account No. 31153043846.

                                    6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

                       case, nature of accusation, huge quantity of recovery of cough

                       syrup and materials that have surfaced during course of

                       investigation, prayer for grant of bail of the petitioner is

                       rejected.



                                             (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
shashank/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.