Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court held that, owing to the simple nature of the injury and the petitioner's fair antecedent, bail could be granted under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Summary

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, was accused of assaulting the informant's son with a wooden log, causing serious but described as simple injury, along with other alleged assaults and theft. He applied for bail, arguing that the parties were agnates and the fight was a trivial dispute, and presented an injury report showing the wound was minor. The State opposed bail, contending the assault could cause grievous injury. The court considered the nature of the injury, the petitioner's clean antecedent, and the existence of a counter‑case, and concluded the injury was simple. Accordingly, the court granted bail subject to a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, and conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 given the alleged assault and nature of injury.
  • Whether the alleged assault constitutes grievous injury warranting denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • assault
  • simple injury
  • fair antecedent
  • Section 482
  • high court
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84906 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-459 Year-2025 Thana- LALGANJ District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Kundan Kumar S/o- Santosh Singh @ Santosh Kumar SIngh Resident of
                 Village- Balua Basant Jahanabad, Ps- Lalganj, Dist- Vaishali

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Manindra Kishore Singh
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   07-01-2026                  Heard the parties.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

                   with Lalganj P.S. Case No. 459 of 2025, registered for the

                   offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 75, 109,

                   303(2) 352, 351(3), 3(5) of the BNS.

                                3. The allegation against the petitioner is of causing

                   assault by means of wood log over the head of the son of the

                   informant due to which he sustained serious injury, besides there

                   is further allegation against other accused persons of causing

                   assault to the informant and others as well as snatching of

                   valuables.

                                4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that

                   the parties are agnates and on account of some trifle, they

                   entered into a free fight resulting into some unfortunate injuries
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84906 of 2025(2) dt.07-01-2026
                                            2/3




          to the persons of both the sides. However, there is counter

          version of the present case being Lalganj P.S. Case No. 458 of

          2025, instituted against the informant and others and admittedly

          the same was instituted on earlier point of time. So far the

          injury, which is allegedly sustained to the informant’s son is

          concerned, the same has been found to be superfluous and

          simple in nature. To support the aforesaid contention, the injury

          report has been placed on record as Annexure-3 to the bail

          application. The petitioner bears fair antecedent and he

          undertakes that he will fully cooperate in the proceeding of the

          court.

                       5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State

          vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the

          petitioner has specifically assaulted the informant’s son over his

          head, which may cause grievous injury.

                       6. Having considered the submissions advanced by

          the learned Advocates for the respective parties and taking note

          of the factum of case and counter case, coupled with the simple

          nature of injury and the fair antecedent, let the petitioner

          abovenamed be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or

          surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks

          from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84906 of 2025(2) dt.07-01-2026
                                                       3/3




                     furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

                     sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                     Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur             in connection with

                     Lalganj P.S. Case No. 459 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid

                     down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha

                     Sanhita, 2023, with the further condition that one of the bailors

                     shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.



                                                 (Harish Kumar, J)
Anjani/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.