Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. Khawaeesh @ Md. KhwaieshversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
REJECTED

Holding

Bail was denied to the petitioner as the allegations were deemed credible and the offences serious.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Khawaeesh, applied for bail in a case where he is accused of kidnapping a minor girl and forcibly establishing a physical relationship with her, offences alleged under Sections 137(1), 140(3), 96 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. The prosecution presented a victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the same Act, asserting the kidnapping and forced relationship. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent and alleged that the FIR was fabricated. The High Court examined the material, including the victim’s statement and the seriousness of the alleged offences involving a minor. Finding the allegations credible and the offences grave, the Court refused the bail application and directed the trial court to expedite the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a kidnapping and forced sexual relationship case involving a minor under the BNS, 2023.
  • Whether the allegations in the FIR are false and the petitioner is entitled to bail.

Legislation cited

  • BNS, 2023 — s. 137(1), 140(3), 183, 3(5), 96

Subjects

  • bail
  • kidnapping
  • sexual assault
  • minor
  • BNS 2023
  • criminal procedure
  • victim statement

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85442 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-376 Year-2024 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Khawaeesh @ Md. Khwaiesh S/O Md. Shamsher Resident of Vill.- Bari
                 Bathana Ward No.- 12, P.S - Manshahi,Dist- Katihar

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Rubi Kumari W/O Sri Rajendra Singh R/O Vill.- Govindpur, P.S- Rautara,
                 Dist.- Katihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Amit Kumar Anand, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   25-03-2026                     Heard Mr. Amit Kumar Anand, learned counsel

                   for the petitioner and Mr. Pranav Kumar, learned Additional

                   Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

                   24.03.2025 in connection with Sessions Trial No. 298 of

                   2025 arising out K. Hat P.S. Case No. 376 of 2024, F.I.R.

                   dated 26.07.2024             for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 137(1), 140(3), 96 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

                               3. According to prosecution case, this petitioner

                   has kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant and

                   forcibly established physical relationship with her.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85442 of 2025(3) dt.25-03-2026
                                            2/3




                      4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been

          implicated in the present case. The allegation as alleged in

          the FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not

          committed any offence as alleged in the FIR.

                      5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor on the

          material available on record as well as case diary has

          vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and

          submits that the statement of the victim was recorded under

          Section 183 of the BNSS, 2023 in which she has

          categorically stated that when she went out of her hostel,

          she was kidnapped by the petitioner and the petitioner has

          forcibly established physical relationship with her and apart

          from aforesaid, the victim was minor on the date of

          occurrence.

                       6.     Considering          the     aforesaid   facts   and

          circumstances, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on

          bail in connection with S. Tr. No. 298 of 2025 arising out of

          K. Hat P.S. Case No. 376 of 2024 pending in the court of

          learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Purnea.

                       7. Prayer is refused.
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85442 of 2025(3) dt.25-03-2026
                                                        3/3




                                   8. However, learned Trial Court is directed to

                      expedite and conclude the trial at the earliest.



                                             (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Vanisha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.