Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Hari Narayan Sah @ Hari Narayan Kumar PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to the conditions prescribed under Section 438(2) CrPC and Section 482(2) B.N.S.S.

Summary

The petitioners, Hari Narayan Sah and Satrudhan Sah, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑death investigation (Shikarpur P.S. Case No. 737 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 80, 238 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution alleged that the informant's daughter, married to Nitesh Kumar, was missing and possibly murdered, with the petitioners named as accused. The petitioners contended they are merely agnates of Nitesh Kumar, have no involvement in the matrimonial dispute, and possess clean antecedents. The State opposed the bail. The High Court, applying Section 438(2) of the CrPC read with Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., granted anticipatory bail subject to strict conditions, including surety, presence in court, and verification of criminal antecedents. The application was consequently disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioners under Section 438(2) of the CrPC in view of the allegations under the B.N.S., 2023.
  • Whether the petitioners, being agnates of the alleged perpetrator, can be held liable for the alleged dowry‑death.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • dowry death
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Section 482 CrPC
  • B.N.S. 2023
  • criminal procedure
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85485 of 2025
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-737 Year-2025 Thana- SIKARPUR District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Hari Narayan Sah @ Hari Narayan Kumar Prasad Son of Rajalal Sah @
                  Sajalal Sah R/o Village - Lachhanauta, Police station - Gaunaha, District -
                  West Champaran.
           2.    Satrudhan Sah @ Satrudhan Prasad Son of Late Ram Dayal Sah R/o Village
                 - Lachhanauta, Police station - Gaunaha, District - West Champaran.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Satyendra Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   15-01-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection

                   with Shikarpur P.S. Case No. 737 of 2025 registered for the

                   offences under Sections 80, 238 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, the informant has

                   alleged that his daughter was married to one Nitesh Kumar and

                   thereafter she went to her matrimonial home. It has further been

                   alleged that subsequently the daughter of the informant

                   complained of torture on account of demand of dowry. It has

                   lastly been alleged that when the informant went to the house of

                   the said Nitesh Kumar, who was residing in a rented premises,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85485 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                            2/4




          he could not find his daughter and therefore has raised

          apprehensions that his daughter had been murdered by the

          accused persons including the petitioners.

                       4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

          petitioners submit that the petitioners are not members of the

          immediate family of the accused Nitesh Kumar and in fact are

          his agnates and have no concern whatsoever with the

          matrimonial affairs of Nitesh Kumar, husband of the deceased.

          It has further been submitted that the allegations levelled in the

          FIR are general and omnibus in nature against all the accused

          persons and that as per the own version of the informant, the

          accused Nitesh Kumar was residing in a rented house belonging

          to Sanjay Kumar and therefore, the petitioners cannot be

          saddled with any liability in connection with the alleged death

          of the daughter of the informant. It has lastly been submitted

          that the husband of the deceased is already in custody and that

          the petitioners carry clean antecedents.

                       5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

          the prayer for anticipatory bail.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid submission, facts and

          circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named be

          released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85485 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                            3/4




          before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks

          from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten

          thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is

          pending/successor court in connection with Shikarpur P.S. Case

          No. 737 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under

          Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with

          corresponding Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S. as well as subject to

          the following conditions:-

                          (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be

                          their close relative.

                          (ii) The petitioners shall remain physically present

                          in Court on each date of the trial.

                          (iii) In case of absence on two consecutive dates, or

                          in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of

                          the petitioners will be liable to be cancelled by the

                          Court concerned.

                          (iv) If the petitioners are found involved in similar

                          nature of offence in future, the prosecution shall be

                          at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

                          (v) The learned Court below shall verify the

                          criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85485 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                                       4/4




                                     any stage it is found that the petitioners have

                                     concealed their criminal antecedents, the court

                                     below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond

                                     of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail

                                     bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall

                                     not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                                     verification.

                                  7. Accordingly, the present application        stands

                     disposed of.



                                              (Sourendra Pandey, J)
aditya/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.