Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sheshnath sahversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that, given the absence of substantive incriminating evidence and the petitioner's willingness to cooperate, regular bail may be granted.

Summary

The petitioner, Sheshnath Sah, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 328, 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging murder and assault. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused assaulted the informant's husband, forced him onto a motorcycle and later administered poison, leading to his death. The petitioner contended innocence, citing a post‑mortem report showing no injuries, lack of eyewitnesses placing him with the deceased, and no evidence of tampering, while offering to cooperate with the trial. The State opposed bail. After considering the submissions, the court ordered bail on condition of a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, finding the petitioner's arguments sufficient to justify release. The application for bail was therefore allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner in a case involving alleged murder, assault and abetment of suicide under Sections 328, 302, 34 and 306 IPC.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • Indian Penal Code
  • murder
  • assault
  • abetment of suicide
  • criminal procedure
  • presumption of innocence

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8551 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-343 Year-2022 Thana- BETTIAH CITY District- West
                                                       Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Sheshnath sah Son of Late Gauri Shankar Sah Resident of village- Kargahiya
                 (paschimi), Ps- Kalibagh District- West Champaran

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   21-04-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has preferred this application for

                   grant of regular bail in connection with Bettiah Town (Kalibagh

                   O.P.) P.S. Case No. 343 of 2022 registered for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 328, 302 and 34 of the I.P.C.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner along

                   with the co-accused persons arrived at the door of the informant

                   and asked to return the outstanding money, from her husband,

                   subsequently, they took the husband of the informant away on a

                   motorcycle. It is further alleged that at about 6:00 P.M., her

                   husband returned and informed the informant that the petitioner

                   and the co-accused persons had assaulted him and forcibly
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8551 of 2026(4) dt.21-04-2026
                                            2/3




          administered poison to him. Upon hearing this, the informant

          attempted to treat her husband using domestic remedies,

          however, after some time he passed away.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

          that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in

          the present case. It has further been submitted that as per the

          postmortem report there is no external or internal injury on the

          person of the deceased (husband of the informant). It has also

          been submitted that, upon returning home, the husband of the

          informant stated that he had been assaulted by the petitioner and

          other co-accused persons, and the poison had been administered

          to him. However, despite having knowledge of his condition, no

          steps were taken by the informant either to take him to the

          nearest hospital or to inform the co-villagers, instead he was

          treated at home. It has further been submitted that after thorough

          investigation the police has submitted charge sheet under

          Section 306 of the IPC and none of the witness has seen the

          petitioner in the company of the deceased either going along

          with him or at any point of time prior to his death. It has also

          been submitted that there is no allegation of tampering with the

          evidence and he undertakes to co-operate in the trial. Lastly, it

          has been submitted that the petitioner has no criminal
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8551 of 2026(4) dt.21-04-2026
                                                          3/3




                        antecedent and is in the custody since 04.12.2025.

                                     5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

                        the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                                     6. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the

                        parties, let the petitioner above-named, be enlarged on bail on

                        furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

                        with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                        learned Court concerned, West Champaran, in connection with

                        Bettiah Town (Kalibagh O.P.) P.S. Case No. 343 of 2022.

                                     7. The application stands allowed.



                                                   (Praveen Kumar, J)
Jyoti/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.