Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to the specified conditions.

Summary

Rahul Kumar was arrested in connection with a robbery‑theft case (Nawada Town P.S. Case No. 191 of 2025) alleged under Sections 331(4) and 305(B) of the B.N.S. He was not named in the FIR; his involvement was inferred from the confessional statement of co‑accused Golu Kumar. The petitioner, who has six prior criminal antecedents, claimed that no incriminating article was found on him and that similarly situated co‑accused had been released on bail. The State opposed the bail application. The Patna High Court, after weighing the lack of direct evidence, the petitioner’s antecedents, and the prosecution’s case, ordered his release on bail with a cash bond of Rs 10,000 and two sureties, imposing detailed conditions including regular police reporting and strict compliance, and reserved the right to cancel bail for any violation. The application was allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite being implicated only through a co‑accused’s confession and having multiple prior criminal antecedents.
  • Whether the conditions imposed by the court for bail are lawful and appropriate under the circumstances.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal antecedents
  • theft
  • robbery
  • Section 331
  • Section 305
  • confessional statement
  • investigation
  • Patna High Court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85531 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-191 Year-2025 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
                 Rahul Kumar Son of Lakhendra Sahani R/o Village- Patalpuri, New Area, P.S.
                 and District- Nawada

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus

                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Birendra Kumar, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Tarun Prasad Mandal, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-01-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Nawada Town P.S. Case No. 191 of 2025 dated 15.02.2025

                   registered for the offences punishable under Sections 331(4) and

                   305(B) of the B.N.S.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, the informant has

                   alleged that some miscreants broke open the locker of the

                   almirah and took away jewellery, other items and Rs. 6,00,000/-

                   cash.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85531 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026
                                            2/4




          petitioner is not named in the FIR and during the course of

          investigation, his name has surfaced on the basis of the

          confessional statement of the co-accused, Golu Kumar. It has

          further been submitted that no incriminating article has been

          recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and

          till date, no T.I.P. has been conducted despite the fact that the

          petitioner is in custody since 21.07.2025. It has further been

          submitted that the petitioner carries six criminal antecedents and

          he has been made accused in the present case. Two similarly

          situated co-accused namely, Shubham Verma and Karan Kumar

          have been enlarged on bail by the Coordinate Bench of this

          court vide order dated 17.09.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.

          67435/2025 and vide order dated 09.10.2025 passed in Cr.

          Misc. No. 70195/2025 respectively.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. has vehemently opposed the prayer

          for bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

          case, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his

          furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand)

          with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

          learned C.J.M., Nawada in connection with Nawada Town P.S.

          Case No. 191 of 2025 subject to the following terms and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85531 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026
                                            3/4




          conditions :-

                        (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the

          petitioner.

                        (ii) The petitioner shall remain physically present before

          the concerned Court on each and every date of the trial and shall

          cooperate in the investigation.

                        (iii) In case of absence on two consecutive dates or in

          violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner

          will liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned.

                        (iv) If the petitioner, in future, is found to be involved

          in similar nature of offence(s), the prosecution shall be at liberty to

          move for cancellation of his bail bond.

                        (v) The trial court shall verify the criminal antecedent of

          the petitioner and in case, at any stage, it is found that the

          petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the trial court

          shall take necessary steps for cancellation of bail bond of the

          petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bond in terms of the

          above mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in

          the name of verification.

                        (vi) In view of the antecedents of the petitioner, the

          petitioner is directed to appear before the Superintendent of

          Police, Nawada within fifteen (15) days of his release with a copy
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85531 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026
                                                       4/4




                     of this order and every two weeks thereafter for the next nine

                     months. The conduct of the petitioner with be kept under watch in

                     this period by the concerned Superintendent of Police and if it is

                     found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the Court

                     concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail

                     of the petitioner for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to

                     the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the

                     petitioner before the Court concerned.

                                  7. It is made clear that the observations, if any, made

                     in this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial.

                                  8. The application stands allowed.



                                              (Sourendra Pandey, J)
Gautam/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.