Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shambhu Nath PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to specified conditions.

Summary

Shambhu Nath Prasad was arrested on 4 September 2025 in connection with a dowry‑related murder alleged under Sections 103(1) and 238 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution claims he, along with others, poisoned the informant’s daughter after a dowry dispute. The petitioner contended he has a clean antecedent, was not present at the scene, and that a statement by the informant’s second daughter, recorded under Section 183 BNSS, exonerates him. The court examined the lack of evidence placing the petitioner at the crime scene and his clean record. Accordingly, the court granted bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of cooperation, non‑tampering with evidence, and verification of antecedents.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to an accused charged under Sections 103(1) and 238 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 in a dowry‑related murder case
  • Whether the petitioner’s alleged non‑presence at the scene and clean antecedent justify bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • murder
  • dowry death
  • poison
  • criminal antecedent
  • Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita
  • Section 103
  • Section 238
  • Section 183
  • statement under BNSS

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85763 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2025 Thana- Dhobaha District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
                 Shambhu Nath Prasad Son of Late Tarkeshwar Prasad Resident of Village -
                 Baghipakar, P.S.- Dhobaha, District - Bhojpur

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Binod Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   25-03-2026                     Heard Mr. Binod Kumar Singh, learned counsel for

                   the petitioner as well as Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

                   04.09.2025 in connection with Dhobaha P.S. Case No. 05 of

                   2025, F.I.R. dated 05.01.2025 for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 103(1) and 238 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.

                               3. According to prosecution case, it is alleged that the

                   petitioner along with other accused persons killed the daughter

                   of the informant by administering poison to her due to non-

                   fulfillment of demand of dowry.

                               4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been

                   implicated in the present case. The statement of second daughter
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85763 of 2025(5) dt.25-03-2026
                                            2/3




          of the informant who was present in the house of the deceased at

          the time of occurrence was recorded under Section 183 BNSS

          and in paragraph no.29 of the case diary in which she has

          categorically stated that after fight between the deceased and

          petitioner, the petitioner proceeded towards shop for work and

          some other person had given poison to the deceased and she

          raised suspicion against the mother-in-law and sister-in-law of

          the deceased in committing the alleged occurrence. He further

          submits that the police after investigation submitted the charge

          sheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since

          04.09.2025.

                      5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has

          vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

          petitioner has clean antecedent and it has come during

          investigation that the petitioner was not present at the place of

          occurrence, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail

          on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with

          two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

          learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara in connection

          with Dhobaha P.S. Case No. 05 of 2025,               subject to the

          following conditions:-
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85763 of 2025(5) dt.25-03-2026
                                                        3/3




                                   i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

                      properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court

                      and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and

                      on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

                      reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                   ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                      witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to

                      move for cancellation of bail.

                                   iii. And further condition that the court below shall

                      verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                      any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                      criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                      cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                      acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                      shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                      verification.



                                             (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Suruchi/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.