Patna High Court
Bittu Kumar @ Bittu Ray @ BiruversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL REJECTED
- Bench
- PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Holding
The court rejected the petition for anticipatory bail, holding that the nature of the accusations did not justify its grant.
Summary
The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, was named in an FIR alleging that he, together with co‑accused, assaulted an informant with an iron pipe and looted construction materials from a site, with some of the stolen items recovered from his house. He filed an application for anticipatory bail, fearing arrest under multiple offences. The offences cited were punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 351(3), 317(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. The court examined whether the seriousness of the allegations warranted the grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the nature of the accusations, the court concluded that the petitioner’s request could not be entertained and rejected the anticipatory bail application. Consequently, the petition for anticipatory bail was dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in view of the alleged assault and looting offences.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 — s. 115(2), 126(2), 303(2), 317(2), 3(5), 351(3)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- assault
- theft
- criminal procedure
- Bihar Narcotic Substances Act
- Section 126(2)
- Section 115(2)
- Section 303(2)
- Section 351(3)
- Section 317(2)
- Section 3(5)
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86020 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2025 Thana- MANER District- Patna
======================================================
Bittu Kumar @ Bittu Ray @ Biru S/O Lagan Ray Resideent of vill - Hathi
Tola ,P.O - Maner ,P.s - Maner ,Dist - Patna , Bihar - 801108
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Govind Kumar S/O Awdhesh Singh R/O - Dinabigha, P.O- Beni Bigha, P.S-
Bikram, Dist.- Patna, Bihar-801104
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Munish Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
2 07-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case,
registered for offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2),
303(2), 351(3), 317(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with specific
accusation that he along with other co-accused persons assaulted
the informant with iron pipe and looted construction materials
from the construction site. Looted articles were recovered from
the house of petitioner.
4. Considering the nature of accusation, the prayer
for anticipatory bail of petitioner is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
anay
U T
Checking your session…