Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

The court held that bail could not be granted and rejected the regular bail application.

Summary

Mukesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered on 4 March 2025 under Sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He applied for regular bail, having been in custody since 22 March 2025 and possessing two prior criminal antecedents. The lower court had earlier rejected his bail application on 2 June 2025. The State opposed bail, citing a report that the trial was underway and likely to conclude within nine months. The Patna High Court, after hearing both sides, considered the seriousness of the allegations and the pending trial schedule, and decided not to grant bail. Consequently, the petitioner's request for regular bail was rejected.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail under Sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 given the nature of the offence and the stage of trial.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • pre‑trial detention
  • serious offence

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86111 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2025 Thana- AMNAUR District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Mukesh Kumar S/O Jelar Ray R/O Village- Gheghta, P.S- Mufassil, District-
                 Saran.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Ms. Chetna, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Vinod Shanker Modi, A.P.P
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   25-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   Amnaur P.S. Case No. 51 of 2025 lodged on 04.03.2025, for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 137(2), 96 & 3(5) of the

                   Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the Court of Judicial

                   Magistrate 1st Class, Saran.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   regular bail application of the petitioner was earlier rejected

                   vide order dated 02.06.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 34278 of

                   2025. Counsel submits that the petitioner is in custody since

                   22.03.2025, having two criminal antecedents. Counsel submits

                   that on previous occasion, report with regard to the present stage

                   of trial was called for. Counsel further submits that no purpose
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86111 of 2025(4) dt.25-02-2026
                                                         2/2




                       would be solved keeping the petitioner in custody.

                                    4. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

                       bail of the petitioner and submits that on earlier occasion, report

                       with regard to the present stage of the trial was called for and

                       from the said report, it transpires that the case has been

                       committed on 28.01.2026 and pending in the concerned trial

                       court for charge on 04.02.2026. It has also been stated in the

                       report that the trial is likely to be concluded within nine months.

                                    5. In the present facts and circumstances of the case

                       and upon seeing the serious allegation, this Court is not inclined

                       to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for regular

                       bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.



                                                                     (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Divyansh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.