Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ankit Kumar @ Ankit Kumar RamversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that bail should be granted, subject to a bond and strict conditions, despite the seriousness of the alleged offences.

Summary

Ankit Kumar was arrested in connection with a rape allegation under Section 70(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Section 6 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleges that he, along with co‑accused, entered the victim's house and raped the victim's daughter on 26‑05‑2025. The petitioner contended that the case is false, motivated by a family dispute, and that the FIR contains inconsistencies and the medical report does not support the charge. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail, citing a prior criminal antecedent. The High Court, after considering the material, granted bail on a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of cooperation, appearance, and non‑tampering with evidence, and ordered verification of the petitioner’s antecedents.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate bail jurisprudence applicable to offences under Section 70(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and Section 6 of the POCSO Act?
  • Whether the existence of a prior criminal antecedent and the seriousness of the alleged offence preclude the grant of bail?
  • Whether the petitioner’s claim of false implication and inconsistencies in the FIR affect the bail decision?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • POCSO
  • rape
  • criminal antecedent
  • bail conditions
  • Indian criminal law

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86122 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-253 Year-2025 Thana- DARAUNDA District- Siwan
                 ======================================================
                 Ankit Kumar @ Ankit Kumar Ram S/O Dharmendra Ram R/O Village-
                 Marasara (Madasara), P.S- Daraunda, District- Siwan.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    X W/O Supendra Ram R/O Village- Marsara, P.S- Daraunda, Distt.- Siwan.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Lokesh Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   30-03-2026                  Despite valid service of notice, no one appeared on

                   behalf of Opposite Party No.2.

                                2.       Heard     Mr. Lokesh Kumar Singh,                learned

                   counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal,

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               3. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

                   28.05.2025 in connection with Daraunda P.S. Case No. 253 of

                   2025, F.I.R. dated 27.05.2025 for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 70(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Section

                   6 of POCSO Act.

                               4. According to prosecution case, it is alleged that on

                   26.05.2025 at 5.00 PM, when the informant went outside her

                   house for work and her daughter was alone at home, then taking
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86122 of 2025(3) dt.30-03-2026
                                            2/4




          advantage of the situation, petitioner along with other co-

          accused persons entered her house and forcefully committed

          rape upon her daughter.

                      5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the

          present case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is

          false and fabricated and petitioner is brother-in-law of the

          victim. It is next submitted that sister of the victim and the

          petitioner got married on 25.05.2025 without will of the parents

          of the victim and in order to falsely implicated the petitioner, the

          present case is lodged by the mother of the victim. Although

          victim has supported the case of the prosecution in her statement

          recorded under section 180 and 183 of BNSS but it appears

          from the FIR that date of the occurrence was on 26.05.2026 but

          the FIR was lodge on2 7.05.2025 i.e. on the next day of the

          alleged occurrence and apart from that medical report of the

          victim does not support the allegations in the FIR. He further

          submits that the police after investigation submitted the charge

          sheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since

          28.05.2025.

                      6. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has

          vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86122 of 2025(3) dt.30-03-2026
                                            3/4




          submits that petitioner carries one criminal antecedent other

          than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of

          paragraph-3 of the bail application that the petitioner is on bail

          in the said matter.

                       7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

          let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of

          the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special

          judge, Exclusive Court, POCSO, Siwan in connection with

          Daraunda P.S. Case No. 253 of 2025, subject to the following

          conditions:-

                       i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

          properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court

          and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and

          on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

          reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                       ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

          witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to

          move for cancellation of bail.

                       iii. And further condition that the court below shall

          verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

          any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86122 of 2025(3) dt.30-03-2026
                                                        4/4




                      criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                      cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                      acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                      shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                      verification.



                                             (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Suruchi/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.