Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. IrshadversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Md. Irshad was arrested in connection with a Forbesganj police case for alleged offences under sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. He petitioned for regular bail, contending that the recovery of the narcotic contraband was falsely shown, that mandatory provisions of sections 42, 50 and 57 of the NDPS Act were not complied with, and that there was no independent witness to the search. The State opposed the bail. The court noted that the main prosecution witnesses are police personnel and that granting bail would not prejudice the trial, especially since the investigation was complete and the quantity involved is intermediate. Consequently, the court ordered his release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.20,000 with two sureties of the same amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the accused under the NDPS Act despite alleged procedural lapses in search and seizure and the nature of the offence.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • search and seizure
  • procedural compliance
  • intermediate quantity
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86127 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-500 Year-2025 Thana- FORBESGANJ District- Araria
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Irshad Son of Md. Mustakim @ Mustakin Resident of village - Rampur
                 South, Ward No.- 03, P.S.- Forbesganj, Dist.- Araria
                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                      ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ramesh Kumar Singh, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Suman Kumari Singh, APP.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   09-01-2026                     Heard Mr. Ramesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel

                   for the petitioner and Mr. Suman Kumari Singh, learned APP for

                   the State.

                                2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 500 of 2025 dated 24.09.2025

                   registered for the offence punishable under sections 8 (c) &

                   21(b) of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act.

                                3. The main submissions advanced by petitioner’s

                   counsel are that the recovery of the alleged narcotic contraband

                   has been falsely shown from the possession of the petitioner

                   and the mandatory provisions particularly of sections 42, 50 and

                   57 of the NDPS Act were not followed by the police party and

                   there is no independent witness of the search and seizure of the

                   alleged contraband, the investigation against the petitioner has

                   been completed and the alleged contraband comes under the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86127 of 2025(2) dt.09-01-2026
                                                        2/2




                      purview of intermediate quantity. It is lastly submitted that the

                      petitioner has been languishing in jail since 25.09.2025, though

                      against the petitioner there are criminal antecedents of two cases

                      but he is on bail in both the cases.

                                   4. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer

                      of the petitioner.

                                   5. In the facts and circumstances of the case as well

                      as considering the above submissions and averments made in

                      the petition and the petitioner’s custody period, coupled with the

                      fact that main prosecution witnesses to be examined in the trial

                      of the petitioner are police personnel, so the release of the

                      petitioner on bail at this stage will not affect the prosecution in

                      any manner, this court is inclined to release the petitioner on

                      bail. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above be released on

                      bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty

                      Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                      satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with

                      Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 500 of 2025.


                                                (Shailendra Singh, J)

siddharthkr/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.