Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner, directing him to furnish a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Summary

Chandan Kumar was arrested in connection with a case involving the illegal possession of arms and a narcotic offence, alleged to have occurred when police recovered a stolen scooter and arms from a house identified as belonging to a suspect named Moti Kumar. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, with only a co-accused’s confessional statement linking him to the crime and no material seized from his possession. He had been in judicial custody since 26 September 2025 and argued that he had no prior involvement in the offence. The State opposed bail, citing the petitioner’s earlier criminal antecedent. After hearing both sides, the Patna High Court granted bail, directing the petitioner to furnish a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriateness of granting bail to the petitioner under the Arms Act and the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act given the evidence primarily consists of a co-accused’s confessional statement and the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedent?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Arms Act
  • Bihar Narcotic Substances Act
  • confessional statement
  • criminal antecedent
  • judicial custody
  • surety

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86509 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2025 Thana- JAYRAMPUR District- Sheikhpura
                 ======================================================
                 Chandan Kumar, Son of Shambhu Saw, R/o - Ganjpar, Barbigha, P.S.-
                 Mission, District - Sheikhpura.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Ms. Priya Kumari, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Bharat Lal, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   05-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Jairampur P.S. Case No. 72 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a and 26 of the Arms

                   Act and Section 317(5) of B.N.S.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that police

                   had information that one Moti Kumar has kept stolen scooter.

                   When they reached the house of Moti Kumar, one man was

                   sitting on the scooter. He started fleeing seeing the police. He

                   could not be apprehended but the local chaukidar identified him

                   as Moti Kumar. The scooter was recovered and from the house,

                   arms were recovered.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86509 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026
                                                         2/2




                       petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

                       committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

                       case. His name has surfaced in the confessional statement of

                       one co-accused Nana Patekar. It has also been submitted that

                       save and except the confessional statement of co-accused,

                       nothing is against the petitioner. No recovery has been made

                       from his possession. He is in judicial custody since 26.09.2025.

                                    5. Learned APP appearing for the State has

                       vehemently opposed the application for bail and has submitted

                       that petitioner is having one criminal antecedent.

                                    6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                       considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                       inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                       petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                       bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                       of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                       J.M.F.C., Sheikhpura in connection with Jairampur P.S. Case

                       No. 72 of 2025.


                                                         (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

lata/-
U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.