Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ranjeet PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to specified conditions.

Summary

Ranjeet Paswan was arrested on 20 March 2025 in connection with a murder case (PS Case No. 122 of 2025) under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. The petitioner claimed that the deceased, the sister of the informant, had committed suicide by hanging, a conclusion supported by the inquest and post‑mortem reports indicating asphyxia. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the FIR was fabricated. The State opposed bail, but the court noted the medical evidence of suicide, the petitioner’s clean antecedent, and the lack of prior complaints. Consequently, the court granted bail on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, imposing conditions of cooperation, presence in court, and non‑tampering with evidence.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted in a murder case where medical evidence suggests suicide
  • Whether the petitioner’s clean antecedent and lack of prior complaints justify bail
  • Whether the conditions imposed are sufficient to safeguard the trial process

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • murder
  • suicide
  • post‑mortem
  • clean antecedent
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86970 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2025 Thana- VAISHALI District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Ranjeet Paswan Son of Rajendra Paswan Resident of Village - Phuladh, P.S.-
                 Vaishali, District - Vaishali.

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Shyameshwar Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   30-03-2026                  Heard         Mr.Shyameshwar         Kumar       Singh,      learned

                   counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan,

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

                   20.03.2025 in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 122 of

                   2025, F.I.R. dated 12.03.2025 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 103,3(5) of BNS,2023.

                                3. The allegation is of committing murder of the sister

                   of the informant.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

                   submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. The allegation

                   as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner

                   has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. In fact the

                   marriage of the petitioner was performed with the deceased 12
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86970 of 2025(4) dt.30-03-2026
                                            2/3




          years back and from the date of marriage till the date of

          occurrence no any complaint has been made against the

          petitioner. In fact the deceased has committed suicide herself

          because the petitioner has made illicit relationship with another

          lady. From a bare perusal of the inquest report of the deceased

          which suggests that the “time elapsed since death and

          postmortem examination is with in 24 hours. Opinion:- In our

          opinion cause of death is due to asphyxia caused by hanging”

          apart from the aforesaid, the postmortem report also reveals that

          the death is due to asphyxia caused by hanging and the police,

          after investigation, submitted chargesheet against the petitioner

          and the petitioner is in custody since 20.03.2025.

                         5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts, petitioner has clean

          antecedent, it has come during investigation as well as in the

          medical evidence which suggests that the deceased has

          committed suicide herself and cause of death is asphyxia, let the

          petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail

          bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the

          like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial

          Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Vaishali P.S.
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86970 of 2025(4) dt.30-03-2026
                                                           3/3




                         Case No. 122 of 2025, with the following conditions:-

                                      (I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

                         properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court

                         and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

                         on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

                         reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                      (II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                         witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

                         for cancellation of bail.

                                      (III) And, further condition that the court below shall

                         verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                         any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                         criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                         cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                         acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                         shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                         verification.



                                                (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Nitesh/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.