Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Duliya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to specified conditions.

Summary

Duliya Devi was arrested in connection with a case alleging possession of 11.682 kg of ganja-like substances recovered from a bus, under Sections 8(c) and 20(B)(ii)B of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. She contended that she had no conscious possession, that the seizure was not signed by independent witnesses, violating Section 50 of the NDPS Act, and that no forensic scientific laboratory report was produced. The State opposed her bail, citing the seriousness of the offence. The High Court, after considering the submissions, granted bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions such as cooperation with the trial, presence of a blood‑relative bailor, and prohibition against tampering with evidence or witnesses. The bail was ordered subject to cancellation if the conditions were breached.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted in an NDPS offence involving alleged possession of a large quantity of narcotic substances.
  • Whether procedural lapses such as lack of independent witness signatures on the seizure list and absence of an FSL report justify bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • possession of narcotics
  • procedural violation
  • seizure list
  • forensic scientific laboratory report
  • court conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87005 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-340 Year-2025 Thana- RAJPUR District- Buxar
                 ======================================================
                 Duliya Devi, W/O Late Radhesyam Singh, R/O Village-Karaila, Police
                 Station-Rajpur, District-Buxar (Bihar)
                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s

                                                        Versus

                 The State of Bihar
                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Om Prakash Upadhyay, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Murli Dhar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   11-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Rajpur

                   P.S. Case No. 340 of 2025 dated 18.10.2025 instituted for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 8(c), 20(B)(ii)B of the

                   Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

                                3. The allegation against the petitioner is that total

                   11.682 kg. Ganja like substances kept in two bags has been

                   recovered from the possession of the petitioner, who was

                   traveling in a bus bearing Registration No. BR44P8131.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and she has been falsely implicated in this

                   case. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the

                   petitioner is lady aged about 40 years and nothing has been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87005 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                            2/3




          recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The

          said Ganja like substances was recovered from the said bus. The

          petitioner has no concern with the said recovered articles. It is

          further submitted that no independent witnesses have put their

          signature over the seizure list and as such, there is complete

          violation of Section 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Lastly, it has been

          submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 18.10.2025

          having no criminal antecedents. Charge-sheet has been

          submitted in the case without any F.S.L. report.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of

          the petitioner.

                       6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of

          the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let

          the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of

          Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

          each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, N.D.P.S.

          Act, Buxar in connection with Rajpur P.S. Case No. 340 of

          2025, subject to the following conditions:-

                          1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall

                          be properly represented on each and every date

                          fixed by the Court and on his absence on two

                          consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87005 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                                       3/3




                                     bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                     2. One of the bailors will be his own blood relation,

                                     preferably father, mother, brother, sister and or his

                                     wife.

                                     3. The bailor shall also state on affidavit that he

                                     will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is

                                     made accused in any other case of similar nature

                                     after his release in the present case and thereafter

                                     the court below will be at liberty to initiate the

                                     proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of

                                     misuse.

                                     4. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                                     witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at

                                     liberty to move for cancellation of bail.


                                                                  (Khatim Reza, J)

premchand/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.