Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sunil RajakversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The court denied anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Summary

The petitioners, Sunil Rajak and Sheojee Yadav, who hold the positions of Ward President and Ward Secretary respectively, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 420, 406, 409 and 34. The prosecution’s informant, Nitesh Kumar, alleged that the petitioners were involved in irregularities related to the ‘Chief Minister Nal Jal Yojana’ and that work in Ward No. 11 of Nagar Panchayat, Jagdishpur was incomplete. The court examined the inquiry report of the Nagar Panchayat, which detailed several unfinished works such as water supply and pipe lines. Considering the allegations and the inquiry findings, the court found sufficient ground to deny the anticipatory bail. Consequently, the petition for anticipatory bail was rejected.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail under the circumstances alleged
  • Whether the allegations of irregularities under the ‘Chief Minister Nal Jal Yojana’ justify denial of anticipatory bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • IPC offences
  • corruption
  • public office
  • ward development
  • Chief Minister Nal Jal Yojana

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87021 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2023 Thana- SAHPUR District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
           1.     Sunil Rajak S/o- Motichand Rajak R/v- Veerpur Ps- Shahpur Dist- Patna
           2.    Sheojee Yadav S/o- Sipahi Rajak @ Sipahi Yadav R/v- Veerpur Ps- Shahpur
                 Dist- Patna

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Prabhat Kumar Singh
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Rabindra Kumar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   10-02-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   A.P.P for the State.

                                2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case,

                   registered for offence punishable under Sections 420, 406, 409,

                   34 of the Indian Penal Code.

                                3. The nformant, namely Nitesh Kumar, alleged that

                   under the ‘Chief Minister Nal Jal Yojana’, the petitioners and

                   others committed several irregularities in their wards and work

                   in question was not completed in Nagar Panchayat, Jagdishpur

                   (Bhojpur).

                                4. Petitioner no. 1 is Ward President and petitioner no.

                   2 is Ward Secretary of Ward No. 11. From bare perusal of the

                   inquiry report, submitted by Nagar Panchayat, Jagdishpur of
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87021 of 2025(2) dt.10-02-2026
                                                       2/2




                     Ward No. 11 (page 59 of the bail petition), it is apparent that

                     work in question was not completed. Details of the same are

                     given hereinbelow:-

                                   “ वारर सं खया- 11

                                   01. सटै र - है ।

                                   02. पानी टं की - है ।

                                   03. पं प बं द ससससत मे है ।

                                   04. आपूसतर पाईप लाईन कने कशन सभी घरो तक नहीं
                                   है ।

                                   05. जलापूसतर - बं द है ।

                                   जलापूसतर पाईप लाईन सवछाने हे तु कसतग्रसत सकये गये
                                   रोर का पी०सी०सी० भी नहीं सकया गया है ।”


                                  5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

                     as also the inquiry report of Nagar Panchayat, Jagdishpur, the

                     prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners is rejected.



                                                      (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
anay

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.