Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Arun Kumar Yadav@Arun YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court exercised its discretion to permit the withdrawal of the bail application, resulting in its dismissal as withdrawn.

Summary

Arun Kumar Yadav was arrested in connection with a criminal case (PS Case No. 245 of 2025) and filed an application for bail before the Patna High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, later sought the court's permission to withdraw the bail application. The State, represented by APP Mr. Shailendra Kumar, opposed the withdrawal. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma granted the petitioner's request, allowing the bail application to be withdrawn. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed as withdrawn, with the court directing that the petitioner may approach the appropriate forum after charges are framed, if advised.

Issues considered

  • What is the court's discretion regarding a petitioner's request to withdraw a bail application?

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal of application
  • criminal procedure
  • court discretion
  • Patna High Court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87078 of 2025
                          Arising Out of PS. Case No.-245 Year-2025 Thana- EKMA District- Saran
                  ======================================================
                  Arun Kumar Yadav@Arun Yadav Son of Roshan Yadav R/o Village-
                  Aamdarhi Marwat, P.S.- Ekma, District- Saran (Chapra)

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    15-01-2026                    Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, learned counsel for

                    the petitioner and Mr. Shailendra Kumar, learned A.P.P. for the

                    State.

                                 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdraw this bail application.

                                 3. Permission is granted.

                                 4. Accordingly, the bail application stands dismissed

                    as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to move before

                    appropriate forum after framing of charges, if so advised.



                                           (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Suruchi/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.