Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kalpana DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The petitioners are entitled to bail in the NDPS case.

Summary

The petitioners, Kalpana Devi and Nirmal Kumar, were arrested in connection with a Banmankhi police case involving a small quantity of smack, alleged under Sections 8(C) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act. The police recovered the narcotic from co‑accused persons, whose statements implicated the petitioners, but no contraband was found on the petitioners themselves. The petitioners argued they were falsely implicated, had no criminal record, and had been in judicial custody since September and October 2025, while the co‑accused had already been granted bail in similar cases. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the NDPS offences. After hearing both sides, the Court found the petitioners’ case stronger and ordered that they be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties each. The order was pronounced by Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey of the Patna High Court.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Sections 8(C) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act given the circumstances of the case.
  • Whether the absence of seized narcotics from the petitioners and their clean antecedents justify bail despite the seriousness of the offence.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • drug offence
  • Section 8C
  • Section 21b
  • criminal procedure
  • presumption of innocence

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87227 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-242 Year-2025 Thana- BANMANKHI District- Purnia
                 ======================================================
           1.     Kalpana Devi, Wife of Asharfi Yadav @ Ashif Yadav, Resident of Ward No.
                  12, Maweshi Hat Banmankhi, P.S.- Banmankhi, District- Purnea
           2.    Nirmal Kumar @ NIrmal Kumar Yadav @ Pappu @ Nirmal Yadav, Son of
                 Asharfi Yadav @ Ashif Yadav, Resident of Ward No. 12, Maweshi Hat
                 Banmankhi, P.S.- Banmankhi, District- Purnea


                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar


                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Bijendra Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Nityanand, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   19-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioners have prayed for bail in connection

                   with Banmankhi P.S. Case No. 242 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 8(C) and 21(b) of the NDPS

                   Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that police

                   received information about trade of smack in a local ‘hatt’.

                   Police reached the spot and apprehended three persons and from

                   their possession, small quantity of smack was recovered. The

                   apprehended persons have disclosed the name of these
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87227 of 2025(2) dt.19-01-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioners.

                       4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

          petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have

          committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this

          case. Nothing has been recovered from them rather their names

          have surfaced only on the statement of the co-accused who have

          stated that they had got the contraband from these petitioners. It

          has further been submitted that the co-accused persons from

          whose possession, smack was recovered have been granted bail

          by learned Co-ordinate Bench vide Cr. Misc. Nos. 68332 of

          2025, 70644 of 2025 and 71783 of 2025. The case of these

          petitioners stands on better footing. They are having no criminal

          antecedent and they are languishing in judicial custody since

          29.09.2025 and 10.10.2025 respectively.

                       5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

          for the State.

                       6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

          considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

          inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named

          petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

          bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87227 of 2025(2) dt.19-01-2026
                                                         3/3




                       Special Judge (N.D.P.S Act), Purnea in connection with

                       Banmankhi P.S. Case No.242 of 2025.


                                                       (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

lata/-
U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.