Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar through The Vigilance

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Kundan Kumar was arrested on allegations of demanding Rs 3 lakh for mutation and receipt in collusion with a Circle Officer, under sections 7(a)(c), 12 and 61(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (amended 2018). The prosecution claimed the petitioner received the money and placed it on the C.O.'s table, supported by a scientific test that his hands turned pink. The petitioner argued he was a mere middle‑man, had no criminal antecedent, and that the C.O. had already been granted bail. The Vigilance Department opposed bail, insisting the petitioner was the actual recipient of the cash. After hearing both sides, the Patna High Court granted regular bail on a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties, subject to the petitioner’s cooperation and appearance in court.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail in a case under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

Subjects

  • bail
  • corruption
  • Prevention of Corruption Act
  • judicial custody
  • middleman
  • scientific examination
  • surety
  • vigilance

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87245 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-76 Year-2025 Thana- VIGILANCE District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Kundan Kumar S/o Late Umesh Mahto @ Umesh Malakar @ Umsh Malakar
                 At. present C/o- Vijay Kumar Chourasia, Village- Bank, P.S- Dandari, Dist-
                 Begusarai, permanent address- Manopur, Muradpur (Muradear), P.S-
                 Bhagwanpur, Dist- Begusarai.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar through The Vigilance Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr. Awnish Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Vigilance       :        Mr. Arvind Kumar, Law Officer, Vigilance
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   05-01-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Law Officer for the Vigilance.

                                 2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under sections 7(a) (c), 12,

                   61(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, amended, 2018.

                                 3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner in

                   connivance with C.O. (Circle Officer) has demanded Rs. 3 lakhs

                   for mutation and issuing receipt thereof. This information was

                   given to the Vigilance Department on which, a team was

                   constituted after verification and it is apparent from the order of

                   the learned trial court that Rs. 2 lakhs was recovered from the

                   possession of this petitioner and it was put on the table of C.O.

                                  Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87245 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned

          counsel for the petitioner has submitted that C.O. has been

          granted bail by learned trial court itself whereas the alleged sum

          was found on the table of the C.O. A statement has been made in

          para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal

          antecedent. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since

          09.09.2025.

                       5. Learned APP appearing for the Vigilance has

          vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail and has

          submitted that actually the cash was received by this petitioner

          and it was put on the table of the C.O which was proved as his

          hands turned pink after scientific examination.

                       6. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

          that in any view of the matter, as per the FIR, the main thrust of

          allegation is against the C.O. The petitioner is only the

          middleman.

                       7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

          considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is

          inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

          petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with

          Patna Vigilance P.S. Case No. 76 of 2025 on furnishing bail

          bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87245 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026
                                                        3/3




                      amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2 nd Additional

                      Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Vigilance, Bhagalpur with

                      the condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in the trial

                      and shall remain present in the trial court whenever

                      required.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Shubham/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.