Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sanjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner, subject to conditions, finding insufficient evidence to deny bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

Summary

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, sought bail in an NDPS case alleging his involvement in a heroin smuggling operation on the Awadh Assam Express. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner facilitated the transaction by purchasing a SIM card and receiving money, supported by call data records and financial transactions, and argued that the offence involved a commercial quantity of heroin, invoking Section 37 of the NDPS Act. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, had no criminal record, and that his name only appeared in a co‑accused’s confession, citing the bail granted to a similarly situated co‑accused. The court examined whether the alleged electronic and financial links sufficed to deny bail in a commercial‑quantity NDPS case. Finding that the evidence did not conclusively tie the petitioner to the recovered heroin and considering the precedent of bail to the co‑accused, the court granted bail with conditions of personal appearance and a surety of Rs.10,000. The bail order was directed to be filed with the Special Judge of the Exclusive Special Court (NDPS), Muzaffarpur.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail can be granted in an NDPS case involving a commercial quantity of heroin under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.
  • Whether the petitioner’s alleged financial transactions and SIM purchase constitute sufficient grounds to deny bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • commercial quantity
  • heroin
  • electronic evidence
  • call data records
  • financial transactions
  • Special Court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87340 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2025 Thana- N.C.B (GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL)
                                                   District- Muzaffarpur
                 ======================================================
                 Sanjay Kumar S/o Late Ram Ekbal Seth Resident of Village - Dinara, Ward
                 No. 8, Diliya Mohalla, P.S - Dinara, District - Rohtas

                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Narcotic Central Bureau, Patna

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :      Mr. Rajiv Kumar, Advocate
                                                Mr. Rajiv Kumar, Advocate
                 For the State           :      Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP
                 For the U.O.I./N.C.B.   :      Mr. Arvind Kumar, C.G.C.
                                                Dr. K.N. Singh, A.S.G.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                        CAV ORDER

5   02-04-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP

                   for the State and the learned counsel for the N.C.B.

                                 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with N.D.P.S. Case No. 137 of 2025, CNR No. BRMZ01-

                   013855-2025, N.C.B. Case No. 03 of 2025. registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 8(C), 21(C), 29 of the

                   N.D.P.S. Act.

                                 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the

                   Narcotic Central Bureau, Patna has received information that

                   Ajay Sahani was carrying a large quantity of heroin in the

                   general coach adjacent to the engine of Awadh Assam Express
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87340 of 2025(5) dt.02-04-2026
                                            2/4




          Train No. 15909 from Dimapur to Muzaffarpur. As the train

          arrived at Muzaffarpur railway station, Akshay Sahni was

          intercepted. He admitted that he is carrying 500 grams of heroin.

          A search of his bag was made, and from his bag, two packets of

          260 grams each of brownish powder, which tested positive for

          heroin were recovered. It is further alleged that Akshay received

          a call from one Nitish Sahani, who was waiting at Jaiswal Meat

          Shop, Motihari and on this information, Nitish Sahani was

          apprehended.

                       4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

          petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

          committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

          case. He also submits that the name of this petitioner has

          surfaced during the confessional statement of one co-accused

          namely, Akshay Sahni. The petitioner was not arrested from

          spot. He was having a shop in Imphal. He further submits that

          similarly situated co-accused namely, Nitish Sahani has been

          granted bail by this court vide Cr. Misc. No. 85094 of 2025. The

          case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. Moreover, a

          statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner

          has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial

          custody since 09.09.2025.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87340 of 2025(5) dt.02-04-2026
                                            3/4




                       5. As against this, the learned counsel for the N.C.B.

          has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and

          has stated that there are evidences to show that the petitioner

          had received money from Akshay and it has been submitted that

          the petitioner has actually purchased the SIM and has handed it

          over to the carriers. He further submits that the offence involves

          commercial quantity of heroin and attracts the rigors of Section

          37 of the NDPS Act and that the petitioner’s involvement is

          supported by electronic evidence, including CDRs and financial

          transactions.

                       6. Countering this, the learned counsel for the

          petitioner has submitted that if, for a moment, it is considered

          that the petitioner was on talking terms with Akshay and that

          there were financial transactions between them, then also it does

          not connect the petitioner with the offence of the NDPS Act, as

          no recovery has been made from him.

                       7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

          considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

          inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with the condition

          that the petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall

          remain physically present on each and every date fixed by

          the learned trial court. The above named petitioner is directed
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87340 of 2025(5) dt.02-04-2026
                                                         4/4




                       to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

                       (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount

                       each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Exclusive

                       Special Court (NDPS), Muzaffarpur in connection with N.D.P.S.

                       Case No. 137 of 2025, CNR No. BRMZ01-013855-2025,

                       N.C.B. Case No. 03 of 2025.



                                                      (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-
AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                23.03.2026
Uploading Date          02.04.2026
Transmission Date       02.04.2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.