Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Raju PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Raju Paswan was arrested in connection with a case (G.R. No. 3006 of 2023) alleging embezzlement of funds related to the construction of a Nal Jal Tower under a government scheme, and was charged under IPC sections 420, 406, 409 and 34. Paswan contended that he was merely the chairman of the overseeing committee and did not execute the work, which was primarily carried out by co‑accused Krishna Nandan Mahto, who had already been granted bail by a coordinate bench. He further argued that the investigation was complete, he had been in custody since 26‑09‑2025, and he had only one prior criminal case in which he was already on bail. The State opposed the bail application. Considering the completed investigation, the petitioner’s prolonged custody, and the precedent of bail to the similarly situated co‑accused, the court granted regular bail on a bond of Rs.20,000 with two sureties of the same amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner under the circumstances of the case

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • IPC sections 420, 406, 409, 34
  • embezzlement
  • construction fraud
  • bail privilege
  • investigation completed

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87396 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2023 Thana- HAYAGHAT District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 Raju Paswan, S/o Shri Dhaniklal Paswan, Resident of Village - Purbi
                 Bilaspur, P.S.- Hayaghat, District- Darbhanga

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Kaushal Kumar, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-01-2026                  1. Heard Mr. Kaushal Kumar,learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, learned APP for the

                   State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   G.R. No. 3006 of 2023, arising out of Hayaghat P. S. Case No.

                   133 of 2023,          dated 04.09.2023 registered for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 420, 406, 409 and 34 of the Indian

                   Penal Code.

                                3. The main submissions advanced by the petitioner's

                   counsel are that the allegation of embezzlement has been

                   levelled against this petitioner and the co-accused mainly on

                   account of non-completion of a part of the construction of Nal

                   Jal Tower under Mukhya Mantri Gramin Pey Jal Nischay

                   Yojana though as per the technical assistant's report, a major
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87396 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026
                                            2/3




          part of the work worth Rs. 10,15,172/- has been recorded in the

          measurement book, however, the petitioner being the Chairman

          of the concerned committee was not instrumental in the

          execution of the said construction work and the co-accused

          Krishna Nandan Mahto was mainly responsible for the alleged

          act upon whose persuasion the petitioner affixed his signature

          on the concerned documents. It is further submitted that the said

          co-accused Krishna Nandan Mahto has already been granted

          bail by the coordinate Bench of this court vide order dated

          20.08.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 42168 of 2025 and it is

          contended that the case of this petitioner stands on better footing

          and further before the High Court the said co-accused had taken

          the plea that he had performed all his work, considering the said

          submission as well as other relevant materials on record his

          prayer for bail was allowed by the coordinate Bench of this

          court. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has one criminal

          antecedent in which he is on bail and he has been languishing in

          jail since 26.09.2025 and against him the investigation has been

          completed.

                       4. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed

          the bail prayer of the petitioner.

                       5.    In the facts and circumstances of this case,
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87396 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026
                                                          3/3




                        considering the above submissions and the averments made in

                        this application mainly taking into account the petitioner's

                        custody period and completion of investigation against him,

                        coupled with the privilege of bail having been granted to the

                        similarly situated co-accused by the coordinate Bench of this

                        Court, this court is inclined to grant the same releif to the

                        petitioner. Accordingly,           let the petitioner named-above be

                        enlarged on bail in connection with G.R. No. 3006 of 2023,

                        arising out of Hayaghat P. S. Case No. 133 of 2023 on

                        furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand)

                        with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                        the Court concerned.



                                                  (Shailendra Singh, J)
Rajiv/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.