Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shivshankar SahversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Summary

Shivshankar Sah and Mukesh Sah applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No.32 of 2025) alleging assault on their brother during a family dispute over property. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners beat the informant, breaking his hands and injuring his head. The petitioners contended they were innocent, falsely implicated, and that the FIR contained only vague, omnibus allegations without specific acts. The court observed that the FIR lacked specific charges against the petitioners and noted the familial nature of the dispute. Consequently, the court granted anticipatory bail to both petitioners, subject to a bail bond, sureties, cooperation with investigation, and verification of any criminal antecedent.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted when the FIR contains only general, non‑specific allegations.
  • Whether the petitioners can be detained pending investigation under the cited sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • criminal procedure
  • FIR
  • family dispute
  • assault
  • property dispute
  • Section 482
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87416 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2025 Thana- MOHANPUR District- Jamui
                 ======================================================
           1.     Shivshankar Sah S/o Nunulal Sah R/o Village - Mangrar, Tola Tetariya,P.S -
                  Mohanpur, District - Jamui
           2.    Mukesh Sah S/o Late Nunulal Sah R/o Village - Mangrar, Tola Tetariya,P.S -
                 Mohanpur, District - Jamui

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Satya Prakash Parasar, Adv
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   23-02-2026                         Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection

                   with Mohanpur P.S. Case No. 32 of 2025, registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 352,

                   351, 109, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that on

                   26.03.2025, at approximately 5:30 p.m., when certain quarrel

                   took place between the family members of the informant and the

                   petitioners during the partition of household goods after the

                   death of the informant's mother about 15 days earlier. It is

                   further alleged that during this quarrel, when the informant
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87416 of 2025(3) dt.23-02-2026
                                            2/3




          objected, the petitioners along with others started beating him

          with sticks and rods. While beating him, they broke his both

          hands and also injured his head. Observing the serious condition

          of the informant, his wife took him to the nearby hospital in

          Laxmipur, where the doctor, seeing the severity, referred him to

          Jamui Sadar Hospital.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

          petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They

          have falsely been implicated in the present case due to family

          dispute. There is no specific allegation attributing any particular

          overt act to the petitioners. He further submits that the

          petitioners have one criminal antecedent.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer of

          anticipatory bail.

                       6. From the reading of the FIR, it transpires that the

          allegations levelled against the petitioners are of general and

          omnibus in nature. No specific allegation of assault has been

          levelled against the petitioners. It is also pertinent to note that

          the informant and these two petitioners are own brothers and

          dispute seems to have been occurred on account of distribution

          of property pursuant to death of their mother. Under these

          circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant privilege of
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87416 of 2025(3) dt.23-02-2026
                                                          3/3




                        anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

                                     7. Let the petitioners, named above, in the event of

                        their arrest or surrender before the Court below within four

                        weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

                        Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like

                        amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial

                        Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Mohanpur P.S. Case No.

                        32 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under section

                        482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and

                        subject to the further condition that:-

                                     (i)   the     petitioners       shall   co-operate   in   the

                        investigation/trial.

                                     (ii) the learned Court would, however, verify the

                        criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case it is found that

                        the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedent, the

                        Court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the

                        petitioners. However, it is expected that the verification process

                        would be done expeditiously without causing any delay.



                                                 (Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
kiran/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.