Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Krishna KumarversusThe State of Bihar through DY. S.P. Vigilance Bihar, Patna.

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that bail may be granted to the petitioner notwithstanding the serious charges, provided strict conditions are imposed to ensure his cooperation and prevent tampering with evidence.

Summary

Krishna Kumar was arrested for allegedly forging his intermediate mark‑sheet and certificate to obtain a government teaching post, and is charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(b). He applied for bail, claiming innocence, lack of prior criminal record, and that he had submitted all required documents at the time of appointment. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences. The court, after considering the petitioner's claim of innocence, the filing of a charge‑sheet, and the absence of any indication of flight risk or tampering, ordered his release on bail subject to strict conditions, including cooperation with the trial and surety requirements. The bail order also stipulated cancellation of bail for non‑appearance on two consecutive dates or for tampering with evidence or witnesses.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner accused under sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • forgery
  • Indian Penal Code
  • teacher appointment
  • criminal procedure
  • section 420
  • section 467
  • section 468
  • section 471
  • section 120(b)

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87589 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2022 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East
                                                        Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Krishna Kumar, S/o Birendra Prasad, R/o Village- Mathiya Bhopat, P.S.-
                 Lakhaura, Distt.- East Champaran.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through DY. S.P. Vigilance Bihar, Patna. Bihar
           2.    The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr. Dhannjay Kumar II, Adv.
                 For the Vigilance       :        Mr. Arvind Kumar, Adv.
                                                  Mr. Paritosh Parimal, Adv.
                 For the State           :        Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   11-02-2026                      Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P for the State.

                                  2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Ghorasahan (Lakhaura) P.S. Case No. 112 of 2022 dated

                   08.03.2022 registered for the offence punishable under

                   Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(b) of the Indian Penal

                   Code.

                                  3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he

                   got government job of Teacher on the basis of forged and

                   fabricated Intermediate Mark-Sheet and Certificate.

                                  4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87589 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                            2/3




          the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in

          this case. It is submitted that at the time of appointment, the

          petitioner furnished all his educational certificates and after

          due verification, he was appointed on the post of Teacher. It

          is submitted that on the direction of this Court, the present

          case has been lodged against the said petitioner. It is also

          submitted that on account of incarceration of the petitioner,

          he could not resign from his service. Further, it is submitted

          that the petitioner undertakes to resign from his service, the

          moment he is released from custody. It is also submitted

          that similarly situated several other persons have already

          been granted bail in different cases. The petitioner is in

          custody since 15.09.2025, having no criminal antecedents

          and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.

                       5. Learned A.P.P for the State opposes the prayer

          for bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Having considered the facts and circumstances

          of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the

          parties, let the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing

          bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties

          of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87589 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                                        3/3




                      C.J.M., Motihari, East Champaran in connection with

                      Ghorasahan (Lakhaura) P.S. Case No. 112 of 2022, subject

                      to the following conditions:-

                                              1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and
                                      shall be properly represented on each and every
                                      date fixed by the Court and on his absence on two
                                      consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail
                                      bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                              2. One of the bailors will be his own blood
                                      relation, preferably father, mother, brother, sister
                                      and or his wife.

                                              3. The bailor shall also state on affidavit that
                                      he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner
                                      is made accused in any other case of similar nature
                                      after his release in the present case and thereafter
                                      the court below will be at liberty to initiate the
                                      proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of
                                      misuse.

                                              4. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence
                                      or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will
                                      be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.



                                                   (Khatim Reza, J)
prabhat/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.